Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
X100VI

Fujifilm

X100VI

Fixed-lens premium compact with 40MP X-Trans and classic street photography design.

$1,599

Released Feb 2024

vs

Ricoh

WG-1000

Entry rugged waterproof compact with 16.35MP sensor, 4x 27-108mm equivalent zoom, USB-C, and simple controls.

$229

Released Jun 2024

WG-1000 is 4 months newer.

Wins

5categories

X100VI

WildlifePortrait

Wins

2categories

WG-1000

1 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

X100VI wins 4 categories·WG-1000 wins 1 categories
  • AX100VI has higher AF points / zones (425 vs 9)
  • AX100VI has higher ISO max (native) (12,800 vs 3,200)
  • AX100VI has higher Resolution (40.2 MP vs 16.35 MP)
  • BWG-1000 has lower Weight (220 g vs 521 g)
  • AX100VI has higher Max video bit rate (200 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)

Key specs at a glance

X100VIWG-1000
Resolution40.2 MP16.35 MP
SensorAPS-C1/2.3 inch
ISO max12,8003,200
Burst20 fps
4K60 fps
IBIS6-stopNo
Weight521 g220 g
Battery310 shots300 shots

Size and weight, to scale

X100VI front view

X100VI

128 × 75 × 55 mm

521 g (1.15 lb / 18.38 oz)

WG-1000

116 × 69 × 51 mm

220 g (0.49 lb / 7.76 oz)

X100VI is 12mm wider, 6mm taller, and 5mm thicker than WG-1000.

X100VI is 301 g heavier than WG-1000.

Depth (front-to-back): 55mm X100VI · 51mm WG-1000

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

X100VI back view

X100VI

128 × 75 mm

WG-1000

116 × 69 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

X100VI top view

X100VI

128 × 55 mm

WG-1000

116 × 51 mm

Sensor size, to scale

X100VI

23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

369 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX100VIWG-1000
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Sports & Action
7.5Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
4.0Fair✓ wins
1.0Limited
Landscape
5.5Fair✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
1.5Limited
Vlogging
7.0Good✓ wins
2.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X100VI

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animal, Bird, Automobile…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 128, 74.8, 55.3

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • AF points / zones

    425 vs 9 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    12,800 vs 3,200 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    40.2 MP vs 16.35 MP — higher is better

  • Eye AF

    Only X100VI supports it

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only X100VI supports it

Reasons to choose

WG-1000

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Pet

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 116, 68.5, 50.5

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Weight

    220 g vs 521 g — lower is better

  • ISO min (native)

    100 vs 125 — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Card slotsBoth 1

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X100VI

Pros

  • Unique fixed 23mm lens
  • 40MP sensor
  • Film simulations
  • Compact street camera

Cons

  • Fixed lens only
  • No interchangeable lenses
  • Premium price

WG-1000

Pros

  • Waterproof and dustproof
  • USB-C
  • Affordable rugged camera
  • 4x optical zoom

Cons

  • Small sensor
  • Full HD only
  • Basic feature set

Full specifications

= category winner

X100VI
WG-1000
Resolution
40.2 MP2.5× more
16.35 MP
Sensor type
APS-C X-Trans CMOS 5 HR
1/2.3" CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 x 15.7 mm
1/2.3 inch
AA filter
No
X100VI
WG-1000
AF system
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
9-point AF / spot AF / auto tracking AF
AF points / zones
42547.2× more
9
AF frame coverage
100 %
Eye AF
Yes
No
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
Animal, Bird, Automobile, Motorcycle/Bike, Airplane, Train
Face, Pet
X100VI
WG-1000
Burst (mechanical)
6 fps
Burst (electronic)
20 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
52 frames
X100VI
WG-1000
Max resolution
6.2K
Full HD
4K max frame rate
60 fps
Max video bit rate
200 Mbps+33%
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
No
No
Log profile
F-Log / F-Log2
Standard profiles
Codecs
H.265, H.264
H.264
X100VI
WG-1000
Weight
521 g
220 g−301 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
128 × 74.8 × 55.3 mm
116 × 68.5 × 50.5 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, X100VI or WG-1000?

X100VI scores 10.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for WG-1000 — 20fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the X100VI and WG-1000?

X100VI is 40.2 MP and WG-1000 is 16.35 MP, so the X100VI captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the X100VI and WG-1000 have in-body image stabilization?

X100VI has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while wG-1000 does not have IBIS.

What's the weight difference between the X100VI and WG-1000?

X100VI weighs 521 g and WG-1000 weighs 220 g, so the WG-1000 is 301 g lighter.

Do the X100VI and WG-1000 record 4K video?

X100VI: 4K up to 60p. WG-1000: Full HD.

Are the X100VI and WG-1000 weather sealed?

X100VI: Yes. WG-1000: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 310 shots (CIPA) for the X100VI and 300 shots for the WG-1000, giving the X100VI the edge.

How much does each cost?

X100VI launched at $1,599 and WG-1000 at $229. The WG-1000 is $1,370 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Fujifilm and Ricoh press materials.