Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
GR IV

Ricoh

GR IV

Latest GR with 25.74MP APS-C sensor, 28mm equivalent lens, 5-axis SR, 53GB internal memory, and pocket street-camera handling.

$1,499

Launch price

Released Jan 2026

vs

Ricoh

WG-1000

Entry rugged waterproof compact with 16.35MP sensor, 4x 27-108mm equivalent zoom, USB-C, and simple controls.

$229

Launch price

Released Jun 2024

GR IV is 1.5 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

4categories

GR IV

PortraitVlogging

Wins

2categories

WG-1000

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

GR IV wins 4 categories·WG-1000 wins 1 categories
  • AGR IV has higher ISO max (native) (204,800 vs 3,200)
  • AGR IV has higher AF points / zones (49 vs 9)
  • AGR IV has higher 1080p max frame rate (60 fps vs 30 fps)
  • AGR IV has higher Resolution (25.74 MP vs 16.35 MP)
  • BWG-1000 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (300 shots vs 250 shots)

Key specs at a glance

GR IVWG-1000
Resolution25.74 MP16.35 MP
SensorAPS-C1/2.3 inch
ISO max204,8003,200
Burst4 fps
4K60 fps
IBISYesNo
Weight262 g220 g
Battery250 shots300 shots

Size and weight, to scale

GR IV front view

GR IV

109 × 61 × 33 mm

262 g (0.58 lb / 9.24 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

WG-1000

116 × 69 × 51 mm

220 g (0.49 lb / 7.76 oz)

GR IV is 7mm narrower, 7mm shorter, and 18mm thinner than WG-1000.

GR IV is 42 g heavier than WG-1000.

Depth (front-to-back): 33mm GR IV · 51mm WG-1000

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

GR IV back view

GR IV

109 × 61 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

WG-1000

116 × 69 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

GR IV top view

GR IV

109 × 33 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

WG-1000

116 × 51 mm

Sensor size, to scale

GR IV

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGR IVWG-1000
Portrait
6.5Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Sports & Action
1.5Limited
1.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited✓ wins
1.0Limited
Landscape
2.5Limited✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
5.5Fair
5.5Fair
Wildlife
1.0Limited
1.5Limited✓ wins
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
2.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GR IV

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.1, 32.7

  • Card types

    Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    204,800 vs 3,200 — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    49 vs 9 — higher is better

  • Eye AF

    Only GR IV supports it

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Eye

  • 1080p max frame rate

    60 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

WG-1000

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 116, 68.5, 50.5

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Pet

  • Weather sealing

    Only WG-1000 supports it

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    300 shots vs 250 shots — higher is better

  • Weight

    220 g vs 262 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Card slotsBoth 1

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GR IV

Pros

  • 25.74MP APS-C sensor
  • 5-axis sensor-shift SR
  • 53GB internal memory
  • Pocketable 28mm GR lens

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • No built-in EVF
  • Full HD video only

WG-1000

Pros

  • Waterproof and dustproof
  • USB-C
  • Affordable rugged camera
  • 4x optical zoom

Cons

  • Small sensor
  • Full HD only
  • Basic feature set

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the GR IV and WG-1000 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

GR IV
WG-1000
Resolution
25.74 MP+57%
16.35 MP
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
1/2.3" CMOS
Sensor size
23.3 x 15.5 mm
1/2.3 inch
AA filter
No
GR IV
WG-1000
Aperture
F2.8-F16
F3.0-F6.6
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
28 mm
27-108 mm
GR IV
WG-1000
Processor
GR ENGINE 7
Image processor
GR IV
WG-1000
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
204,800+6 stops
3,200
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
3,200
GR IV
WG-1000
Shutter type
Leaf shutter
Mechanical + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, GR IV or WG-1000?

GR IV scores 6.5/10 versus 1.0/10 for WG-1000 — 25.74MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the GR IV and WG-1000?

GR IV is 25.74 MP and WG-1000 is 16.35 MP, so the GR IV captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the GR IV and WG-1000 have in-body image stabilization?

GR IV has in-body image stabilization, while WG-1000 does not have IBIS.

What's the weight difference between the GR IV and WG-1000?

GR IV weighs 262 g and WG-1000 weighs 220 g, so the WG-1000 is 42 g lighter.

Do the GR IV and WG-1000 record 4K video?

GR IV: 4K up to 60p. WG-1000: Full HD.

Are the GR IV and WG-1000 weather sealed?

GR IV: No. WG-1000: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 250 shots (CIPA) for the GR IV and 300 shots for the WG-1000, giving the WG-1000 the edge.

How much does each cost?

GR IV launched at $1,499 and WG-1000 at $229. The WG-1000 is $1,270 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way GR IV vs WG-1000 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Ricoh press materials.