Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark III

Canon

EOS R6 Mark III

Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.

$2,799

Released Nov 2025

vs

Ricoh

WG-1000

Entry rugged waterproof compact with 16.35MP sensor, 4x 27-108mm equivalent zoom, USB-C, and simple controls.

$229

Released Jun 2024

EOS R6 Mark III is 1.4 years newer.

Wins

6categories

EOS R6 Mark III

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

1categories

WG-1000

1 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark III wins 4 categories·WG-1000 wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 9)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 3,200)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • BWG-1000 has lower Weight (220 g vs 699 g)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Battery life (CIPA) (640 shots vs 300 shots)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIIWG-1000
Resolution32.5 MP16.35 MP
SensorFull Frame1/2.3 inch
ISO max64,0003,200
Burst40 fps
4K120 fps
IBIS8.5-stopNo
Weight699 g220 g
Battery640 shots300 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III front view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)

WG-1000

116 × 69 × 51 mm

220 g (0.49 lb / 7.76 oz)

EOS R6 Mark III is 22mm wider, 30mm taller, and 38mm thicker than WG-1000.

EOS R6 Mark III is 479 g heavier than WG-1000.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 51mm WG-1000

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark III back view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 mm

WG-1000

116 × 69 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark III top view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 88 mm

WG-1000

116 × 51 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark III

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

WG-1000: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIIWG-1000
Portrait
8.0Excellent✓ wins
1.0Limited
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
1.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
2.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark III

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 9 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    64,000 vs 3,200 — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 300 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

WG-1000

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Pet

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 116, 68.5, 50.5

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Weight

    220 g vs 699 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark III

Pros

  • 32.5MP full-frame sensor
  • 7K RAW video & 4K 120p
  • 40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
  • 8.5-stop IBIS

Cons

  • Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
  • Smaller LCD than R5 II
  • LP-E6P required for full features

WG-1000

Pros

  • Waterproof and dustproof
  • USB-C
  • Affordable rugged camera
  • 4x optical zoom

Cons

  • Small sensor
  • Full HD only
  • Basic feature set

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark III
WG-1000
Resolution
32.5 MP+99%
16.35 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
1/2.3" CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
1/2.3 inch
AA filter
Yes
EOS R6 Mark III
WG-1000
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
9-point AF / spot AF / auto tracking AF
AF points / zones
1053117× more
9
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
No
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Face, Pet
EOS R6 Mark III
WG-1000
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
150 frames
EOS R6 Mark III
WG-1000
Max resolution
7K RAW
Full HD
4K max frame rate
120 fps
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps17.3× more
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ / HLG
Standard profiles
Codecs
CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
H.264
EOS R6 Mark III
WG-1000
Weight
699 g
220 g−479 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
116 × 68.5 × 50.5 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 Mark III or WG-1000?

EOS R6 Mark III scores 8.0/10 versus 1.0/10 for WG-1000 — 32.5MP — ample resolution for portraits.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and WG-1000?

EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and WG-1000 is 16.35 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and WG-1000 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while wG-1000 does not have IBIS.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and WG-1000?

EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and WG-1000 weighs 220 g, so the WG-1000 is 479 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and WG-1000 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. WG-1000: Full HD.

Are the EOS R6 Mark III and WG-1000 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. WG-1000: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark III and 300 shots for the WG-1000, giving the EOS R6 Mark III the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and WG-1000 at $229. The WG-1000 is $2,570 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Ricoh press materials.