Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R1

Canon

EOS R1

Flagship 24.2MP full-frame BSI stacked RF body with 40fps burst, Dual Pixel Intelligent AF, 6K RAW, and 9.44M-dot EVF.

$6,299

Released Jul 2024

vs

Ricoh

WG-1000

Entry rugged waterproof compact with 16.35MP sensor, 4x 27-108mm equivalent zoom, USB-C, and simple controls.

$229

Released Jun 2024

Released within a month of each other.

Wins

4categories

EOS R1

Video & HybridSports & Action

Wins

1categories

WG-1000

1 categories tied

Check current prices

Search these camera bodies at major authorized retailers to check current discounts, bundled lenses, and certified refurbished deals:

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R1 wins 4 categories·WG-1000 wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R1 has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 9)
  • AEOS R1 has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 3,200)
  • BWG-1000 has lower Weight (220 g vs 1115 g)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
  • AEOS R1 has higher Resolution (24.2 MP vs 16.35 MP)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R1WG-1000
Resolution24.2 MP16.35 MP
SensorFull Frame1/2.3 inch
ISO max102,4003,200
Burst40 fps
4K120 fps
IBIS8.5-stopNo
Weight1115 g220 g
Battery300 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R1 front view

EOS R1

158 × 150 × 87 mm

1115 g (2.46 lb / 39.33 oz)

WG-1000

116 × 69 × 51 mm

220 g (0.49 lb / 7.76 oz)

EOS R1 is 42mm wider, 81mm taller, and 37mm thicker than WG-1000.

EOS R1 is 895 g heavier than WG-1000.

Depth (front-to-back): 87mm EOS R1 · 51mm WG-1000

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R1 back view

EOS R1

158 × 150 mm

WG-1000

116 × 69 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R1 top view

EOS R1

158 × 87 mm

WG-1000

116 × 51 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R1

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R1

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

WG-1000: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R1WG-1000
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
1.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
1.0Limited
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
4.5Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
2.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R1

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 157.6, 149.5, 87.3

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, CFexpress Type B

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 9 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 3,200 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R1 supports it

  • Eye AF

    Only EOS R1 supports it

Reasons to choose

WG-1000

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Pet

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 116, 68.5, 50.5

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Weight

    220 g vs 1115 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R1

Pros

  • 40fps electronic burst
  • 24.2MP BSI stacked full-frame sensor
  • Dual Pixel Intelligent AF
  • 6K RAW and 4K 120p video
  • Dual CFexpress Type B slots

Cons

  • 24MP resolution
  • Very expensive
  • Large integrated-grip body

WG-1000

Pros

  • Waterproof and dustproof
  • USB-C
  • Affordable rugged camera
  • 4x optical zoom

Cons

  • Small sensor
  • Full HD only
  • Basic feature set

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R1
WG-1000
Resolution
24.2 MP+48%
16.35 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame BSI Stacked CMOS
1/2.3" CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
1/2.3 inch
AA filter
Yes
EOS R1
WG-1000
AF system
Dual Pixel Intelligent AF with cross-type AF
9-point AF / spot AF / auto tracking AF
AF points / zones
1053117× more
9
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-7.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
No
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Face, Pet
EOS R1
WG-1000
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
EOS R1
WG-1000
Max resolution
6K RAW
Full HD
4K max frame rate
120 fps
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
Standard profiles
Codecs
RAW, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
H.264
EOS R1
WG-1000
Weight
1115 g
220 g−895 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
157.6 × 149.5 × 87.3 mm
116 × 68.5 × 50.5 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, EOS R1 or WG-1000?

EOS R1 scores 9.0/10 versus 1.0/10 for WG-1000 — 6K video for oversampled 4K.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R1 and WG-1000?

EOS R1 is 24.2 MP and WG-1000 is 16.35 MP, so the EOS R1 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R1 and WG-1000 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R1 has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while wG-1000 does not have IBIS.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R1 and WG-1000?

EOS R1 weighs 1115 g and WG-1000 weighs 220 g, so the WG-1000 is 895 g lighter.

Do the EOS R1 and WG-1000 record 4K video?

EOS R1: 6K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p. WG-1000: Full HD.

Are the EOS R1 and WG-1000 weather sealed?

EOS R1: Yes. WG-1000: Yes.

How much does each cost?

EOS R1 launched at $6,299 and WG-1000 at $229. The WG-1000 is $6,070 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Ricoh press materials.