Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Ricoh

WG-1000

Entry rugged waterproof compact with 16.35MP sensor, 4x 27-108mm equivalent zoom, USB-C, and simple controls.

$229

Released Jun 2024

vs
Alpha 7R VI

Sony

Alpha 7R VI

66.8MP fully-stacked full-frame high-resolution body with 30fps bursts, 8K 30p, 4K 120p, and Sony's new BIONZ XR2 engine.

$4,499

Released Jun 2026

Alpha 7R VI is 1.9 years newer.

Wins

1categories

WG-1000

Wins

6categories

Alpha 7R VI

PortraitVideo & Hybrid

1 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

WG-1000 wins 1 categories·Alpha 7R VI wins 4 categories
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher AF points / zones (759 vs 9)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher ISO max (native) (32,000 vs 3,200)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Resolution (66.8 MP vs 16.35 MP)
  • BAlpha 7R VI has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AWG-1000 has lower Weight (220 g vs 713 g)

Key specs at a glance

WG-1000Alpha 7R VI
Resolution16.35 MP66.8 MP
Sensor1/2.3 inchFull Frame
ISO max3,20032,000
IBISNoYes
Weight220 g713 g
Battery300 shots600 shots
Burst30 fps
4K120 fps

Size and weight, to scale

WG-1000

116 × 69 × 51 mm

220 g (0.49 lb / 7.76 oz)

Alpha 7R VI front view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 × 83 mm

713 g (1.57 lb / 25.15 oz)

WG-1000 is 17mm narrower, 28mm shorter, and 32mm thinner than Alpha 7R VI.

WG-1000 is 493 g lighter than Alpha 7R VI.

Depth (front-to-back): 51mm WG-1000 · 83mm Alpha 7R VI

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

WG-1000

116 × 69 mm

Alpha 7R VI back view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

WG-1000

116 × 51 mm

Alpha 7R VI top view

Alpha 7R VI

133 × 83 mm

Sensor size, to scale

Alpha 7R VI

35.9 × 24 mm · Full Frame

862 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

WG-1000: mount data unavailable

Alpha 7R VI

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseWG-1000Alpha 7R VI
Portrait
1.0Limited
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
1.5Limited
5.5Fair✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
1.0Limited
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
1.5Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
5.5Fair✓ wins
5.0Fair
Wildlife
1.5Limited
6.5Good✓ wins
Vlogging
2.5Limited
5.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

WG-1000

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Pet

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 116, 68.5, 50.5

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Weight

    220 g vs 713 g — lower is better

  • Weather sealing

    Only WG-1000 supports it

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7R VI

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132.7, 96.9, 82.9

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A, SDXC UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    759 vs 9 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    32,000 vs 3,200 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I…

  • Resolution

    66.8 MP vs 16.35 MP — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

WG-1000

Pros

  • Waterproof and dustproof
  • USB-C
  • Affordable rugged camera
  • 4x optical zoom

Cons

  • Small sensor
  • Full HD only
  • Basic feature set

Alpha 7R VI

Pros

  • 66.8MP fully-stacked Exmor RS sensor
  • 30fps blackout-free electronic burst
  • 8K 30p and 4K 120p video
  • 8.5-stop in-body stabilization
  • 9.44M-dot HDR OLED EVF

Cons

  • Very expensive
  • Large files demand fast cards and storage
  • 8K workflow can be heavy

Full specifications

= category winner

WG-1000
Alpha 7R VI
Resolution
16.35 MP
66.8 MP4.1× more
Sensor type
1/2.3" CMOS
Full-Frame Stacked CMOS
Sensor size
1/2.3 inch
35.9 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
No
WG-1000
Alpha 7R VI
AF system
9-point AF / spot AF / auto tracking AF
Contrast Detection / Phase Detection
AF points / zones
9
75984.3× more
AF low-light limit
-6 EV
Eye AF
No
Yes
Animal / bird AF
No
Yes
Subject recognition
Face, Pet
Human, Animal, Bird, Eye, Insect, Vehicle
WG-1000
Alpha 7R VI
Burst (electronic)
30 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
RAW buffer depth
150 frames
WG-1000
Alpha 7R VI
Max resolution
Full HD
8K
4K max frame rate
120 fps
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
600 Mbps4× more
Internal RAW video
No
No
Log profile
Standard profiles
S-Cinetone / S-Log3
Codecs
H.264
XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I, H.265, H.264
WG-1000
Alpha 7R VI
Weight
220 g−493 g less
713 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
116 × 68.5 × 50.5 mm
132.7 × 96.9 × 82.9 mm
Weather sealing
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, WG-1000 or Alpha 7R VI?

Alpha 7R VI scores 8.5/10 versus 1.0/10 for WG-1000 — 66.8MP — excellent for large prints and crops.

What's the resolution difference between the WG-1000 and Alpha 7R VI?

WG-1000 is 16.35 MP and Alpha 7R VI is 66.8 MP, so the Alpha 7R VI captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the WG-1000 and Alpha 7R VI have in-body image stabilization?

WG-1000 does not have IBIS, while alpha 7R VI has in-body image stabilization.

What's the weight difference between the WG-1000 and Alpha 7R VI?

WG-1000 weighs 220 g and Alpha 7R VI weighs 713 g, so the WG-1000 is 493 g lighter.

Do the WG-1000 and Alpha 7R VI record 4K video?

WG-1000: Full HD. Alpha 7R VI: 8K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the WG-1000 and Alpha 7R VI weather sealed?

WG-1000: Yes. Alpha 7R VI: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 300 shots (CIPA) for the WG-1000 and 600 shots for the Alpha 7R VI, giving the Alpha 7R VI the edge.

How much does each cost?

WG-1000 launched at $229 and Alpha 7R VI at $4,499. The WG-1000 is $4,270 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Ricoh and Sony press materials.