Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Hasselblad

X1D-50c

First mirrorless medium format camera — 50MP CMOS in a stunningly compact Hasselblad body.

$8,995

Launch price

Released Jun 2016

vs
OM-3

OM System

OM-3

Retro-styled MFT body with modern AF and creator-friendly design.

$1,699

Launch price

Released Jan 2025

OM-3 is 8.6 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

X1D-50c

★ Wildlife★ Landscape

Wins

7categories

OM-3

★ Sports & Action★ Travel

4 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

X1D-50c wins 3 categories·OM-3 wins 2 categories
  • BOM-3 has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 117)
  • BOM-3 has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 20 fps)
  • AX1D-50c has lower ISO min (native) (64 vs 200)
  • AX1D-50c has higher Resolution (50 MP vs 20.4 MP)
  • AX1D-50c has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)

Key specs at a glance

X1D-50cOM-3
Resolution50 MP20.4 MP
Sensor43.8 × 32.9 mmMFT
ISO max25,60025,600
Burst20 fps120 fps
4K60 fps59.94 fps
IBIS7-stop6.5-stop
Weight725 g413 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

X1D-50c

150 × 98 × 71 mm

725 g (1.60 lb / 25.57 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

OM-3 front view

OM-3

139 × 89 × 46 mm

413 g (0.91 lb / 14.57 oz)

X1D-50c is 11mm wider, 9mm taller, and 25mm thicker than OM-3.

X1D-50c is 312 g heavier than OM-3.

Depth (front-to-back): 71mm X1D-50c · 46mm OM-3

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

X1D-50c

150 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-3 back view

OM-3

139 × 89 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

X1D-50c

150 × 71 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-3 top view

OM-3

139 × 46 mm

Sensor size, to scale

X1D-50c

43.8 × 32.9 mm · Medium Format

1441 mm² area

OM-3

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

6.4× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

X1D-50c: mount data unavailable

OM-3

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX1D-50cOM-3
Portrait
6.0Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
5.5Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
6.5Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
5.0Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Vlogging
5.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X1D-50c

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 150, 98, 71

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • ISO min (native)

    64 vs 200 — lower is better

  • Resolution

    50 MP vs 20.4 MP — higher is better

  • Card slots

    2 vs 1 — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    3,690,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    7 stops vs 6.5 stops — higher is better

Reasons to choose

OM-3

  • AF low-light limit

    -5.5 EV vs -2 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 139.3, 88.9, 45.8

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 117 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds MOV, MPEG-4 AVC

  • Weather sealing

    Only OM-3 supports it

Both cameras share

  • ✓ISO max (native) — Both 25,600
  • ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
  • ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
  • ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
  • ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
  • ✓In-body stabilization (IBIS) — Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X1D-50c

Pros

  • ✓First mirrorless MF
  • ✓Iconic design
  • ✓50MP medium format
  • ✓XCD mount launch

Cons

  • –Very slow AF
  • –No IBIS
  • –Superseded by X1D II

OM-3

Pros

  • ✓Retro design
  • ✓Modern AF
  • ✓Compact

Cons

  • –MFT sensor
  • –Premium for MFT
  • –Smaller lens selection

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the X1D-50c and OM-3 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

✓ = category winner

X1D-50c
OM-3
Resolution
50 MP✓2.5× more
20.4 MP
Sensor type
Medium Format CMOS
BSI Stacked MOS
Sensor size
43.8 × 32.9 mm
17.4 x 13
AA filter
No
No
X1D-50c
OM-3
Processor
Image processor
TruePic X
X1D-50c
OM-3
ISO min (native)
64✓−136 less
200
ISO max (native)
25,600
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
X1D-50c
OM-3
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/32000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, X1D-50c or OM-3?

X1D-50c scores 6.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for OM-3 — 50MP — massive detail for large prints.

What's the resolution difference between the X1D-50c and OM-3?

X1D-50c is 50 MP and OM-3 is 20.4 MP, so the X1D-50c captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the X1D-50c and OM-3 have in-body image stabilization?

X1D-50c has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while OM-3 has 6.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the X1D-50c or the OM-3?

X1D-50c reaches 20 fps electronic. OM-3 reaches 120 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the X1D-50c and OM-3?

X1D-50c weighs 725 g and OM-3 weighs 413 g, so the OM-3 is 312 g lighter.

Do the X1D-50c and OM-3 record 4K video?

X1D-50c: 4K up to 60p. OM-3: 4K up to 59.94p.

Are the X1D-50c and OM-3 weather sealed?

X1D-50c: No. OM-3: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the X1D-50c and 640 shots for the OM-3, giving the OM-3 the edge.

How much does each cost?

X1D-50c launched at $8,995 and OM-3 at $1,699. The OM-3 is $7,296 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way X1D-50c vs OM-3 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of Hasselblad and OM System press materials.