Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Leica

Q3 43

Q3 variant with 43mm equivalent perspective for classic reportage.

$5,995

Launch price

Released Jun 2024

vs
OM-3

OM System

OM-3

Retro-styled MFT body with modern AF and creator-friendly design.

$1,699

Launch price

Released Jan 2025

OM-3 is 7 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

5categories

Q3 43

LandscapePortrait

Wins

6categories

OM-3

Sports & ActionTravel

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Q3 43 wins 3 categories·OM-3 wins 2 categories
  • BOM-3 has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AQ3 43 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 200)
  • AQ3 43 has higher ISO max (native) (100,000 vs 25,600)
  • AQ3 43 has higher Resolution (60.3 MP vs 20.4 MP)
  • BOM-3 has higher Burst (mechanical) (10 fps vs 4 fps)

Key specs at a glance

Q3 43OM-3
Resolution60.3 MP20.4 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max100,00025,600
Burst15 fps120 fps
4K60 fps59.94 fps
IBISNo6.5-stop
Weight743 g413 g
Battery350 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Q3 43

130 × 80 × 92 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

OM-3 front view

OM-3

139 × 89 × 46 mm

413 g (0.91 lb / 14.57 oz)

Q3 43 is 9mm narrower and 9mm shorter than OM-3 but it is also 46mm thicker.

Q3 43 is 330 g heavier than OM-3.

Depth (front-to-back): 92mm Q3 43 · 46mm OM-3

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Q3 43

130 × 80 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-3 back view

OM-3

139 × 89 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Q3 43

130 × 92 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

OM-3 top view

OM-3

139 × 46 mm

Sensor size, to scale

Q3 43

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

OM-3

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

Q3 43: mount data unavailable

OM-3

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseQ3 43OM-3
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
5.0Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
8.0Excellent✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
4.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
5.5Fair
5.5Fair
Vlogging
3.0Limited
6.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Q3 43

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Face, Eye…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130, 80, 92

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 200 — lower is better

  • ISO max (native)

    100,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    60.3 MP vs 20.4 MP — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds ProRes

Reasons to choose

OM-3

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 139.3, 88.9, 45.8

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    10 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only OM-3 supports it

  • Codecs

    Adds MOV, MPEG-4 AVC

  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)

    Only OM-3 supports it

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Q3 43

Pros

  • Unique 43mm view
  • 60MP
  • Premium compact

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • Expensive
  • Niche focal length

OM-3

Pros

  • Retro design
  • Modern AF
  • Compact

Cons

  • MFT sensor
  • Premium for MFT
  • Smaller lens selection

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Q3 43 and OM-3 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Q3 43
OM-3
Resolution
60.3 MP3× more
20.4 MP
Sensor type
Full-frame BSI CMOS
BSI Stacked MOS
Sensor size
36 x 24 mm
17.4 x 13
AA filter
No
No
Q3 43
OM-3
Aperture
f/2
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
43 mm
Q3 43
OM-3
Processor
Maestro Series processor with L2 Technology
TruePic X
Q3 43
OM-3
ISO min (native)
50−150 less
200
ISO max (native)
100,000+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
100,000
102,400
Q3 43
OM-3
Shutter type
Electronic + mechanical shutter
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/2000 sec
1/8000
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/32000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, Q3 43 or OM-3?

Q3 43 scores 8.0/10 versus 2.5/10 for OM-3 — 60.3MP — massive detail for large prints.

What's the resolution difference between the Q3 43 and OM-3?

Q3 43 is 60.3 MP and OM-3 is 20.4 MP, so the Q3 43 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Q3 43 and OM-3 have in-body image stabilization?

Q3 43 does not have IBIS, while OM-3 has 6.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Q3 43 or the OM-3?

Q3 43 reaches 15 fps electronic. OM-3 reaches 120 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Q3 43 and OM-3?

Q3 43 weighs 743 g and OM-3 weighs 413 g, so the OM-3 is 330 g lighter.

Do the Q3 43 and OM-3 record 4K video?

Q3 43: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. OM-3: 4K up to 59.94p.

Are the Q3 43 and OM-3 weather sealed?

Q3 43: Yes. OM-3: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 350 shots (CIPA) for the Q3 43 and 640 shots for the OM-3, giving the OM-3 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Q3 43 launched at $5,995 and OM-3 at $1,699. The OM-3 is $4,296 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Q3 43 vs OM-3 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of Leica and OM System press materials.