Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Leica

Q3

Full-frame fixed 28mm f/1.7 premium compact for documentary and travel.

$5,995

Released May 2023

vs

Ricoh

GR Digital IV

Cult compact GR Digital with 10MP CCD sensor, fast 28mm equivalent f/1.9 lens, and sensor-shift stabilization.

$599

Released Sep 2011

Q3 is 11.7 years newer.

Wins

5categories

Q3

LandscapePortrait

Wins

2categories

GR Digital IV

3 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

Q3 wins 4 categories·GR Digital IV wins 1 categories
  • AQ3 has higher ISO max (native) (100,000 vs 3,200)
  • AQ3 has higher Burst (electronic) (15 fps vs 1.54 fps)
  • AQ3 has higher Resolution (60.3 MP vs 10 MP)
  • BGR Digital IV has lower Weight (219 g vs 743 g)
  • AQ3 has higher Burst (mechanical) (4 fps vs 1.54 fps)

Key specs at a glance

Q3GR Digital IV
Resolution60.3 MP10 MP
SensorFull Frame1/1.7 inch
ISO max100,0003,200
Burst15 fps1.54 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBISNoYes
Weight743 g219 g
Battery350 shots390 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Q3

130 × 80 × 92 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

GR Digital IV

109 × 60 × 33 mm

219 g (0.48 lb / 7.73 oz)

Q3 is 21mm wider, 20mm taller, and 60mm thicker than GR Digital IV.

Q3 is 524 g heavier than GR Digital IV.

Depth (front-to-back): 92mm Q3 · 33mm GR Digital IV

Sensor size, to scale

Q3

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseQ3GR Digital IV
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
2.0Limited
Sports & Action
4.5Fair✓ wins
0.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
8.0Excellent✓ wins
1.0Limited
Travel
4.5Fair
5.0Fair✓ wins
Wildlife
5.5Fair✓ wins
0.0Limited
Vlogging
3.0Limited
5.0Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Q3

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Face, Eye…

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264, ProRes

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130, 80, 92

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • ISO max (native)

    100,000 vs 3,200 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    15 fps vs 1.54 fps — higher is better

  • Resolution

    60.3 MP vs 10 MP — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    4 fps vs 1.54 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

GR Digital IV

  • Codecs

    Adds Motion JPEG AVI

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 108.6, 59.8, 32.5

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, Eye-Fi

  • Weight

    219 g vs 743 g — lower is better

  • In-body stabilization

    Only GR Digital IV supports it

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    390 shots vs 350 shots — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Max video bit rateBoth 150 Mbps
  • Card slotsBoth 1

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Q3

Pros

  • 60MP full-frame
  • Summilux 28mm lens
  • Built like a tank
  • Unique aesthetic

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • Very expensive
  • No interchangeable system

GR Digital IV

Pros

  • Fast f/1.9 GR lens
  • CCD rendering
  • Compact classic
  • Sensor-shift stabilization

Cons

  • Small sensor
  • VGA video only
  • Very old model

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Q3 and GR Digital IV at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

Q3
GR Digital IV
Resolution
60.3 MP6× more
10 MP
Sensor type
Full-frame BSI CMOS
1/1.7" CCD
Sensor size
36 x 24 mm
1/1.7 inch
AA filter
No
Q3
GR Digital IV
AF system
Hybrid AF (phase detection + contrast AF + DFD)
Hybrid AF
Eye AF
Yes
No
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
Human, Face, Eye, Animal
Q3
GR Digital IV
Burst (mechanical)
4 fps2.6× more
1.54 fps
Burst (electronic)
15 fps9.7× more
1.54 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
No
No
Q3
GR Digital IV
Max resolution
8K
VGA
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
No
No
Log profile
L-Log / HLG
Standard profiles
Codecs
H.265, H.264, ProRes
Motion JPEG AVI
Q3
GR Digital IV
Weight
743 g
219 g−524 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
130 × 80 × 92 mm
108.6 × 59.8 × 32.5 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, Q3 or GR Digital IV?

Q3 scores 8.0/10 versus 1.0/10 for GR Digital IV — 60.3MP — massive detail for large prints.

What's the resolution difference between the Q3 and GR Digital IV?

Q3 is 60.3 MP and GR Digital IV is 10 MP, so the Q3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the Q3 and GR Digital IV have in-body image stabilization?

Q3 does not have IBIS, while gR Digital IV has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Q3 or the GR Digital IV?

Q3 reaches 15 fps electronic. GR Digital IV reaches 1.54 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Q3 and GR Digital IV?

Q3 weighs 743 g and GR Digital IV weighs 219 g, so the GR Digital IV is 524 g lighter.

Do the Q3 and GR Digital IV record 4K video?

Q3: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. GR Digital IV: 4K up to 60p.

Are the Q3 and GR Digital IV weather sealed?

Q3: Yes. GR Digital IV: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 350 shots (CIPA) for the Q3 and 390 shots for the GR Digital IV, giving the GR Digital IV the edge.

How much does each cost?

Q3 launched at $5,995 and GR Digital IV at $599. The GR Digital IV is $5,396 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.