Leica
Q3
Full-frame fixed 28mm f/1.7 premium compact for documentary and travel.
$5,995
Released May 2023
Ricoh
WG-80
Rugged waterproof compact with 16MP sensor, 5x zoom, ring light, and microscope-friendly macro shooting.
$329
Released Jun 2022
Q3 is 11 months newer.
Wins
Q3
Wins
WG-80
2 categories tied
Check current prices
Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:
As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
TL;DR — Key differences
- AQ3 has higher ISO max (native) (100,000 vs 6,400)
- BWG-80 has lower Weight (194 g vs 743 g)
- AQ3 has higher Resolution (60.3 MP vs 16 MP)
- AQ3 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 125)
- AQ3 has higher Battery life (CIPA) (350 shots vs 300 shots)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
Q3
130 × 80 × 92 mm
743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)
WG-80
123 × 62 × 30 mm
194 g (0.43 lb / 6.84 oz)
Q3 is 8mm wider, 19mm taller, and 63mm thicker than WG-80.
Q3 is 549 g heavier than WG-80.
Depth (front-to-back): 92mm Q3 · 30mm WG-80
Sensor size, to scale
Q3
36 × 24 mm · Full Frame
864 mm² area
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
Q3
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 130, 80, 92
Card types
Adds SD UHS-II
ISO max (native)
100,000 vs 6,400 — higher is better
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Eye, Animal
Resolution
60.3 MP vs 16 MP — higher is better
Codecs
Adds H.265, ProRes
ISO min (native)
50 vs 125 — lower is better
Eye AF
Only Q3 supports it
Reasons to choose
WG-80
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 122.5, 61.5, 29.5
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
Weight
194 g vs 743 g — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds Pet
Both cameras share
- ✓Max video bit rate — Both 150 Mbps
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
- ✓Card slots — Both 1
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
Q3
Pros
- ✓60MP full-frame
- ✓Summilux 28mm lens
- ✓Built like a tank
- ✓Unique aesthetic
Cons
- –Fixed lens
- –Very expensive
- –No interchangeable system
WG-80
Pros
- ✓Waterproof and shockproof
- ✓5x optical zoom
- ✓Ring light macro
- ✓Affordable rugged compact
Cons
- –Small sensor
- –Full HD only
- –Basic LCD
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the Q3 and WG-80 at major authorized retailers.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for portraits, Q3 or WG-80?
Q3 scores 7.5/10 versus 1.0/10 for WG-80 — 60.3MP — excellent for large prints and crops.
What's the resolution difference between the Q3 and WG-80?
Q3 is 60.3 MP and WG-80 is 16 MP, so the Q3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the Q3 and WG-80 have in-body image stabilization?
Q3 does not have IBIS, while wG-80 does not have IBIS.
What's the weight difference between the Q3 and WG-80?
Q3 weighs 743 g and WG-80 weighs 194 g, so the WG-80 is 549 g lighter.
Do the Q3 and WG-80 record 4K video?
Q3: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. WG-80: Full HD.
Are the Q3 and WG-80 weather sealed?
Q3: Yes. WG-80: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 350 shots (CIPA) for the Q3 and 300 shots for the WG-80, giving the Q3 the edge.
How much does each cost?
Q3 launched at $5,995 and WG-80 at $329. The WG-80 is $5,666 less.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.