Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
Q3

Leica

Q3

Full-frame fixed 28mm f/1.7 premium compact for documentary and travel.

$5,995

Launch price

Released May 2023

vs
fp L

Sigma

fp L

World's smallest full-frame interchangeable camera with 61MP and L-mount.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Jul 2021

Q3 is 1.9 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

7categories

Q3

LandscapePortrait

Wins

3categories

fp L

WildlifePortrait

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Q3 wins 4 categories·fp L wins 1 categories
  • AQ3 has higher ISO max (native) (100,000 vs 25,600)
  • AQ3 has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 2,360,000)
  • AQ3 has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 29.97 fps)
  • AQ3 has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 100)
  • Bfp L has lower Weight (427 g vs 743 g)

Key specs at a glance

Q3fp L
Resolution60.3 MP61 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max100,00025,600
Burst15 fps10 fps
4K60 fps29.97 fps
IBISNoNo
Weight743 g427 g
Battery350 shots240 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Q3 front view

Q3

130 × 80 × 92 mm

743 g (1.64 lb / 26.21 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

fp L front view

fp L

113 × 70 × 45 mm

427 g (0.94 lb / 15.06 oz)

Q3 is 17mm wider, 10mm taller, and 47mm thicker than fp L.

Q3 is 316 g heavier than fp L.

Depth (front-to-back): 92mm Q3 · 45mm fp L

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

Q3 back view

Q3

130 × 80 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

fp L back view

fp L

113 × 70 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

Q3 top view

Q3

130 × 92 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

fp L top view

fp L

113 × 45 mm

Sensor size, to scale

Q3

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

fp L

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseQ3fp L
Portrait
7.5Good
7.5Good
Sports & Action
5.0Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
8.0Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good
Travel
4.5Fair
5.0Fair✓ wins
Wildlife
5.5Fair
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
3.0Limited
4.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Q3

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 130, 80, 92

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • ISO max (native)

    100,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, ProRes

  • EVF resolution

    5,760,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 29.97 fps — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 100 — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

Reasons to choose

fp L

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 112.6, 69.9, 45.3

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Codecs

    Adds CinemaDNG, MOV

  • AA filter

    Only fp L supports it

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Bird, Vehicle

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only fp L supports it

  • Internal RAW video

    Only fp L supports it

  • Microphone jack (3.5mm)

    Only fp L supports it

Both cameras share

  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Max video bit rateBoth 150 Mbps
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Q3

Pros

  • 60MP full-frame
  • Summilux 28mm lens
  • Built like a tank
  • Unique aesthetic

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • Very expensive
  • No interchangeable system

fp L

Pros

  • Tiny full-frame
  • 61MP
  • L-mount
  • Unique industrial design

Cons

  • No IBIS
  • Small battery
  • Minimal ergonomics

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Q3 and fp L at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Q3
fp L
Resolution
60.3 MP
61 MP+1%
Sensor type
Full-frame BSI CMOS
BSI CMOS
Sensor size
36 x 24 mm
36 x 24
AA filter
No
Yes
Q3
fp L
Aperture
f/1.7
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
28 mm
Q3
fp L
Processor
Maestro Series processor with L2 Technology
Image processor
Q3
fp L
ISO min (native)
50−50 less
100
ISO max (native)
100,000+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
100,000
102,400
Q3
fp L
Shutter type
Electronic + mechanical shutter
Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/2000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/8000

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, Q3 or fp L?

fp L scores 8.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for Q3 — Bird AF subject recognition.

What's the resolution difference between the Q3 and fp L?

Q3 is 60.3 MP and fp L is 61 MP, so the fp L captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

How does stabilization compare between the Q3 and fp L?

Q3 does not have IBIS, while fp L does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the Q3 or the fp L?

Q3 reaches 15 fps electronic. fp L reaches 10 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the Q3 and fp L?

Q3 weighs 743 g and fp L weighs 427 g, so the fp L is 316 g lighter.

Do the Q3 and fp L record 4K video?

Q3: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. fp L: 4K up to 29.97p.

Are the Q3 and fp L weather sealed?

Q3: Yes. fp L: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 350 shots (CIPA) for the Q3 and 240 shots for the fp L, giving the Q3 the edge.

How much does each cost?

Q3 launched at $5,995 and fp L at $2,499. The fp L is $3,496 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Q3 vs fp L vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Leica and Sigma press materials.