Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
OM-3

OM System

OM-3

Retro-styled MFT body with modern AF and creator-friendly design.

$1,699

Launch price

Released Jan 2025

vs

OM System

Tough TG-6

Olympus-era rugged waterproof compact with 12MP BSI sensor, f/2.0 4x zoom, 4K30 video, 1cm macro, 15m waterproof, and TruePic VIII — predecessor to TG-7.

$449

Launch price

Released Jul 2019

OM-3 is 5.5 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

OM-3

Sports & ActionTravel

Wins

3categories

Tough TG-6

5 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-3 wins 4 categories·Tough TG-6 wins 1 categories
  • AOM-3 has higher IBIS effectiveness (6.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AOM-3 has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 11 fps)
  • BTough TG-6 has lower ISO min (native) (100 vs 200)
  • AOM-3 has higher Resolution (20.4 MP vs 12 MP)
  • AOM-3 has higher Burst (mechanical) (10 fps vs 6 fps)

Key specs at a glance

OM-3Tough TG-6
Resolution20.4 MP12 MP
SensorMFTMFT
ISO max25,60025,600
Burst120 fps11 fps
4K59.94 fps60 fps
IBIS6.5-stopNo
Weight413 g580 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-3 front view

OM-3

139 × 89 × 46 mm

413 g (0.91 lb / 14.57 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Tough TG-6

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

OM-3 is 2mm shorter and 26mm thinner than Tough TG-6 but it is also 5mm wider.

OM-3 is 167 g lighter than Tough TG-6.

Depth (front-to-back): 46mm OM-3 · 72mm Tough TG-6

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

OM-3 back view

OM-3

139 × 89 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Tough TG-6

134 × 91 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

OM-3 top view

OM-3

139 × 46 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Tough TG-6

134 × 72 mm

Sensor size, to scale

OM-3

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

Tough TG-6

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-3

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Tough TG-6: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-3Tough TG-6
Portrait
4.0Fair✓ wins
3.0Limited
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
4.5Fair✓ wins
Landscape
2.5Limited✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Wildlife
5.5Fair✓ wins
5.0Fair
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-3

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    6.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 139.3, 88.9, 45.8

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 11 fps — higher is better

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only OM-3 supports it

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only OM-3 supports it

  • Codecs

    Adds MOV, MPEG-4 AVC

Reasons to choose

Tough TG-6

  • AF low-light limit

    -7 EV vs -5.5 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134, 91, 72

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • AA filter

    Only Tough TG-6 supports it

  • ISO min (native)

    100 vs 200 — lower is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 59.94 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO max (native)Both 25,600
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Battery life (CIPA)Both 640 shots
  • Card slotsBoth 1

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-3

Pros

  • Retro design
  • Modern AF
  • Compact

Cons

  • MFT sensor
  • Premium for MFT
  • Smaller lens selection

Tough TG-6

Pros

  • 15m waterproof + 2.1m shockproof
  • f/2.0 25-100mm equivalent zoom
  • 1cm Variable Macro System
  • 4K30 + 1080p120 slow-mo
  • Built-in GPS + fisheye converter support

Cons

  • 1/2.3-inch small sensor
  • Superseded by TG-7 (no USB-C)
  • Fixed non-touch LCD
  • Micro USB 2.0 only

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-3 and Tough TG-6 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-3
Tough TG-6
Resolution
20.4 MP+70%
12 MP
Sensor type
BSI Stacked MOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
17.4 x 13
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
OM-3
Tough TG-6
Processor
TruePic X
TruePic VIII
OM-3
Tough TG-6
ISO min (native)
200
100−100 less
ISO max (native)
25,600
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
OM-3
Tough TG-6
Shutter type
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, OM-3 or Tough TG-6?

OM-3 scores 8.5/10 versus 5.0/10 for Tough TG-6 — 120fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-3 and Tough TG-6?

OM-3 is 20.4 MP and Tough TG-6 is 12 MP, so the OM-3 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the OM-3 and Tough TG-6 have in-body image stabilization?

OM-3 has 6.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Tough TG-6 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-3 or the Tough TG-6?

OM-3 reaches 120 fps electronic. Tough TG-6 reaches 11 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-3 and Tough TG-6?

OM-3 weighs 413 g and Tough TG-6 weighs 580 g, so the OM-3 is 167 g lighter.

Do the OM-3 and Tough TG-6 record 4K video?

OM-3: 4K up to 59.94p. Tough TG-6: 4K up to 60p.

Are the OM-3 and Tough TG-6 weather sealed?

OM-3: Yes. Tough TG-6: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the OM-3 and 640 shots for the Tough TG-6, giving the Tough TG-6 the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-3 launched at $1,699 and Tough TG-6 at $449. The Tough TG-6 is $1,250 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way OM-3 vs Tough TG-6 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of OM System press materials.