Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
OM-3

OM System

OM-3

Retro-styled MFT body with modern AF and creator-friendly design.

$1,699

Launch price

Released Jan 2025

vs

Sony

Alpha 7 III

Classic 24MP hybrid that defined the modern full-frame value proposition.

$1,999

Launch price

Released Feb 2018

OM-3 is 6.9 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

10categories

OM-3

★ Sports & Action★ Travel

Wins

5categories

Alpha 7 III

★ Travel★ Portrait

2 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-3 wins 2 categories·Alpha 7 III wins 3 categories
  • AOM-3 has higher Burst (electronic) (120 fps vs 10 fps)
  • AOM-3 has higher Max video bit rate (205 Mbps vs 100 Mbps)
  • BAlpha 7 III has lower ISO min (native) (100 vs 200)
  • BAlpha 7 III has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 25,600)
  • BAlpha 7 III has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)

Key specs at a glance

OM-3Alpha 7 III
Resolution20.4 MP24.2 MP
SensorMFTFull Frame
ISO max25,60051,200
Burst120 fps10 fps
4K59.94 fps30 fps
IBIS6.5-stop5-stop
Weight413 g650 g
Battery640 shots710 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-3 front view

OM-3

139 × 89 × 46 mm

413 g (0.91 lb / 14.57 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 7 III

127 × 96 × 74 mm

650 g (1.43 lb / 22.93 oz)

OM-3 is 7mm shorter and 28mm thinner than Alpha 7 III but it is also 12mm wider.

OM-3 is 237 g lighter than Alpha 7 III.

Depth (front-to-back): 46mm OM-3 · 74mm Alpha 7 III

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

OM-3 back view

OM-3

139 × 89 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 III

127 × 96 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

OM-3 top view

OM-3

139 × 46 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7 III

127 × 74 mm

Sensor size, to scale

OM-3

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

Alpha 7 III

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

3.7× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-3

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Alpha 7 III

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-3Alpha 7 III
Portrait
4.0Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
3.5Limited
5.0Fair✓ wins
Landscape
2.5Limited
7.0Good✓ wins
Travel
8.0Excellent
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
5.5Fair
5.5Fair
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-3

  • AF low-light limit

    -5.5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 139.3, 88.9, 45.8

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Burst (electronic)

    120 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, MOV, MPEG-4 AVC

  • Max video bit rate

    205 Mbps vs 100 Mbps — higher is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only OM-3 supports it

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7 III

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 126.9, 95.6, 73.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-I

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC S, AVCHD

  • AA filter

    Only Alpha 7 III supports it

  • ISO min (native)

    100 vs 200 — lower is better

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Card slots

    2 vs 1 — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
  • ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
  • ✓Burst (mechanical) — Both 10 fps
  • ✓In-body stabilization (IBIS) — Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
  • ✓EVF refresh rate — Both 120 Hz

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-3

Pros

  • ✓Retro design
  • ✓Modern AF
  • ✓Compact

Cons

  • –MFT sensor
  • –Premium for MFT
  • –Smaller lens selection

Alpha 7 III

Pros

  • ✓Proven reliability
  • ✓Great battery life
  • ✓Strong value used
  • ✓Dual card slots

Cons

  • –Older AF vs newer bodies
  • –4K 30p only
  • –No 10-bit internal

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the OM-3 and Alpha 7 III at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

✓ = category winner

OM-3
Alpha 7 III
Resolution
20.4 MP
24.2 MP✓+19%
Sensor type
BSI Stacked MOS
Full Frame Exmor R CMOS
Sensor size
17.4 x 13
35.6 × 23.8 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
OM-3
Alpha 7 III
Processor
TruePic X
BIONZ X
OM-3
Alpha 7 III
ISO min (native)
200
100✓−100 less
ISO max (native)
25,600
51,200✓+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
204,800
OM-3
Alpha 7 III
Shutter type
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000
1/8000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, OM-3 or Alpha 7 III?

OM-3 scores 8.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for Alpha 7 III — 120fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-3 and Alpha 7 III?

OM-3 is 20.4 MP and Alpha 7 III is 24.2 MP, so the Alpha 7 III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the OM-3 and Alpha 7 III have in-body image stabilization?

OM-3 has 6.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 7 III has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-3 or the Alpha 7 III?

OM-3 reaches 120 fps electronic. Alpha 7 III reaches 10 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-3 and Alpha 7 III?

OM-3 weighs 413 g and Alpha 7 III weighs 650 g, so the OM-3 is 237 g lighter.

Do the OM-3 and Alpha 7 III record 4K video?

OM-3: 4K up to 59.94p. Alpha 7 III: 4K up to 30p.

Are the OM-3 and Alpha 7 III weather sealed?

OM-3: Yes. Alpha 7 III: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the OM-3 and 710 shots for the Alpha 7 III, giving the Alpha 7 III the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-3 launched at $1,699 and Alpha 7 III at $1,999. The OM-3 is $300 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way OM-3 vs Alpha 7 III vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of OM System and Sony press materials.