Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

OM System

OM-5 Mark II

Compact IP53 Micro Four Thirds body with 20MP Live MOS sensor, 7.5-stop Sync IS, 30fps burst, 4K video, and USB-C charging.

$1,199

Released Jun 2025

vs

OM System

OM-D E-M10 Mark III

Entry MFT with IBIS and approachable design for beginners.

$649

Released Aug 2017

OM-5 Mark II is 7.8 years newer.

Wins

8categories

OM-5 Mark II

TravelSports & Action

Wins

2categories

OM-D E-M10 Mark III

7 categories tied

Check current prices

Search these camera bodies at major authorized retailers to check current discounts, bundled lenses, and certified refurbished deals:

TL;DR — Key differences

OM-5 Mark II wins 3 categories·OM-D E-M10 Mark III wins 2 categories
  • AOM-5 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (6.5 stops vs 0 stops)
  • BOM-D E-M10 Mark III has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 121)
  • AOM-5 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AOM-5 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 11 fps)
  • BOM-D E-M10 Mark III has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 30 fps)

Key specs at a glance

OM-5 Mark IIOM-D E-M10 Mark III
Resolution20.4 MP16 MP
SensorMFTMFT
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst30 fps11 fps
4K30 fps60 fps
IBIS6.5-stopNo
Weight417 g580 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

OM-5 Mark II

125 × 85 × 52 mm

417 g (0.92 lb / 14.71 oz)

OM-D E-M10 Mark III

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

OM-5 Mark II is 9mm narrower, 6mm shorter, and 20mm thinner than OM-D E-M10 Mark III.

OM-5 Mark II is 163 g lighter than OM-D E-M10 Mark III.

Depth (front-to-back): 52mm OM-5 Mark II · 72mm OM-D E-M10 Mark III

Sensor size, to scale

OM-5 Mark II

17.4 × 13 mm · Compact / large-type

226 mm² area

OM-D E-M10 Mark III

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

OM-5 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

OM-D E-M10 Mark III

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOM-5 Mark IIOM-D E-M10 Mark III
Portrait
4.0Fair✓ wins
3.0Limited
Sports & Action
6.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Video & Hybrid
4.5Fair
4.5Fair
Landscape
2.5Limited✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Vlogging
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

OM-5 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -8 EV vs -7 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Birds, Animals…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    6.5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 125.3, 85.2, 52

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 11 fps — higher is better

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only OM-5 Mark II supports it

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only OM-5 Mark II supports it

Reasons to choose

OM-D E-M10 Mark III

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134, 91, 72

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 121 — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only OM-D E-M10 Mark III supports it

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Max video bit rateBoth 150 Mbps
  • Battery life (CIPA)Both 640 shots
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • EVF resolutionBoth 2,360,000

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

OM-5 Mark II

Pros

  • Compact weather-sealed body
  • 7.5-stop Sync IS
  • 30fps burst
  • 4K vertical video

Cons

  • 20MP non-stacked sensor
  • Single card slot
  • Smaller EVF than OM-1

OM-D E-M10 Mark III

Pros

  • IBIS at entry price
  • Compact
  • Easy menus

Cons

  • 16MP
  • No weather sealing
  • Older

Full specifications

= category winner

OM-5 Mark II
OM-D E-M10 Mark III
Resolution
20.4 MP+27%
16 MP
Sensor type
4/3 Live MOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
17.4 x 13.0 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
No
Yes
OM-5 Mark II
OM-D E-M10 Mark III
AF system
121-point all cross-type phase detection AF
Cross-type PDAF
AF points / zones
121
10538.7× more
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-8 EV
-7 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
People, Birds, Animals, Motorsports, Airplanes, Trains
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
OM-5 Mark II
OM-D E-M10 Mark III
Burst (mechanical)
10 fps+67%
6 fps
Burst (electronic)
30 fps2.7× more
11 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
60 frames
OM-5 Mark II
OM-D E-M10 Mark III
Max resolution
4K / C4K
4K UHD
4K max frame rate
30 fps
60 fps2× more
Max video bit rate
150 Mbps
150 Mbps
Internal RAW video
No
No
Log profile
OM-Log / HLG
Standard profiles
Codecs
H.264, H.265, MOV
H.265, H.264
OM-5 Mark II
OM-D E-M10 Mark III
Weight
417 g−163 g less
580 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
125.3 × 85.2 × 52 mm
134 × 91 × 72 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for travel, OM-5 Mark II or OM-D E-M10 Mark III?

OM-5 Mark II scores 8.0/10 versus 5.0/10 for OM-D E-M10 Mark III — 417g — ultralight for all-day carry.

What's the resolution difference between the OM-5 Mark II and OM-D E-M10 Mark III?

OM-5 Mark II is 20.4 MP and OM-D E-M10 Mark III is 16 MP, so the OM-5 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the OM-5 Mark II and OM-D E-M10 Mark III have in-body image stabilization?

OM-5 Mark II has 6.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while oM-D E-M10 Mark III does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the OM-5 Mark II or the OM-D E-M10 Mark III?

OM-5 Mark II reaches 30 fps electronic. OM-D E-M10 Mark III reaches 11 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the OM-5 Mark II and OM-D E-M10 Mark III?

OM-5 Mark II weighs 417 g and OM-D E-M10 Mark III weighs 580 g, so the OM-5 Mark II is 163 g lighter.

Do the OM-5 Mark II and OM-D E-M10 Mark III record 4K video?

OM-5 Mark II: 4K up to 30p. OM-D E-M10 Mark III: 4K up to 60p.

Are the OM-5 Mark II and OM-D E-M10 Mark III weather sealed?

OM-5 Mark II: Yes. OM-D E-M10 Mark III: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the OM-5 Mark II and 640 shots for the OM-D E-M10 Mark III, giving the OM-D E-M10 Mark III the edge.

How much does each cost?

OM-5 Mark II launched at $1,199 and OM-D E-M10 Mark III at $649. The OM-D E-M10 Mark III is $550 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.