Panasonic
AG-CX350
Broadcast 4K camcorder with 1-inch 15MP MOS sensor, 20x zoom, 10-bit ALL-Intra/HEVC, HLG, 3G-SDI, dual XLR, and NDI|HX option.
$5,995
Launch priceReleased Sep 2019
Sony
PXW-Z200
AI-powered XDCAM with 1-inch Exmor RS sensor, 20x G Lens zoom, 4K60/120p, 12G-SDI, XAVC MXF, variable ND, and RTMP/SRT streaming.
$3,999
Launch priceReleased Sep 2024
PXW-Z200 is 5 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
AG-CX350
Wins
PXW-Z200
5 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AAG-CX350 has lower Weight (580 g vs 1960 g)
- AAG-CX350 has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)
- AAG-CX350 has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 25,600)
- AAG-CX350 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
- AAG-CX350 has higher RAW buffer depth (200 frames vs 120 frames)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to shareAG-CX350
134 × 91 × 72 mm
580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
PXW-Z200
176 × 201 × 371 mm
1960 g (4.32 lb / 69.14 oz)
AG-CX350 is 42mm narrower, 110mm shorter, and 299mm thinner than PXW-Z200.
AG-CX350 is 1380 g lighter than PXW-Z200.
Depth (front-to-back): 72mm AG-CX350 · 371mm PXW-Z200
Sensor size, to scale
AG-CX350
17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds
225 mm² area
PXW-Z200
13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1″
116 mm² area
1.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
AG-CX350
Codecs
Adds H.265, H.264, ProRes
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 134, 91, 72
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II
Weight
580 g vs 1960 g — lower is better
Max video bit rate
600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better
ISO max (native)
51,200 vs 25,600 — higher is better
4K max frame rate
120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better
Internal RAW video
Only AG-CX350 supports it
Reasons to choose
PXW-Z200
Codecs
Adds XAVC MXF, XAVC S-I, XAVC HS…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 175.6, 201.3, 371.1
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
Battery life (CIPA)
640 shots vs 520 shots — higher is better
AF frame coverage
94 % vs 90 % — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
- ✓Card slots — Both 2
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
AG-CX350
Pros
- ✓1-inch 15MP MOS (2000 TV lines)
- ✓4K 10-bit ALL-Intra & HEVC LongG
- ✓3G-SDI + dual XLR + genlock/timecode
- ✓Built-in ND + IR cut filter
- ✓HLG / V-Log L compatible workflow
Cons
- –Heavy at 1.9 kg body-only
- –Premium broadcast pricing
- –Fixed 20x lens
- –NDI requires optional license
PXW-Z200
Pros
- ✓12G-SDI + timecode in/out for broadcast
- ✓XAVC MXF / XAVC S-I / XAVC HS codecs
- ✓AI subject recognition AF + auto framing
- ✓4K up to 60p / 120p slow motion
- ✓Variable ND (1/4–1/128) + S-Cinetone
Cons
- –Premium over HXR-NX800
- –Heavy at 1.96 kg body-only
- –Some MXF features require firmware 2.0+
- –C3 Portal streaming is paid add-on
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the AG-CX350 and PXW-Z200 at major authorized retailers.
Panasonic AG-CX350
Sony PXW-Z200
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for video, AG-CX350 or PXW-Z200?
AG-CX350 scores 9.5/10 versus 5.0/10 for PXW-Z200 — 8K recording for future-proof footage.
What's the resolution difference between the AG-CX350 and PXW-Z200?
AG-CX350 is 15 MP and PXW-Z200 is 14 MP, so the AG-CX350 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the AG-CX350 and PXW-Z200 have in-body image stabilization?
AG-CX350 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while PXW-Z200 does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the AG-CX350 or the PXW-Z200?
AG-CX350 reaches 30 fps electronic. PXW-Z200 reaches 20 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the AG-CX350 and PXW-Z200?
AG-CX350 weighs 580 g and PXW-Z200 weighs 1960 g, so the AG-CX350 is 1380 g lighter.
Do the AG-CX350 and PXW-Z200 record 4K video?
AG-CX350: 8K / 6K (max), 4K up to 120p. PXW-Z200: 4K up to 60p.
Are the AG-CX350 and PXW-Z200 weather sealed?
AG-CX350: Yes. PXW-Z200: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the AG-CX350 and 640 shots for the PXW-Z200, giving the PXW-Z200 the edge.
How much does each cost?
AG-CX350 launched at $5,995 and PXW-Z200 at $3,999. The PXW-Z200 is $1,996 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way AG-CX350 vs PXW-Z200 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.