Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Sony

PXW-Z200

AI-powered XDCAM with 1-inch Exmor RS sensor, 20x G Lens zoom, 4K60/120p, 12G-SDI, XAVC MXF, variable ND, and RTMP/SRT streaming.

$3,999

Launch price

Released Sep 2024

vs

Sony

PXW-Z300

Flagship 3-CMOS XDCAM with 1/2-inch Exmor R sensors, 17x f/1.9 zoom, AI subject AF, 4K60p, flexible LCD arm, and content authentication.

$8,298

Launch price

Released Oct 2025

PXW-Z300 is 1.1 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

2categories

PXW-Z200

WildlifeSports & Action

Wins

8categories

PXW-Z300

Sports & ActionWildlife

6 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

PXW-Z200 wins 1 categories·PXW-Z300 wins 4 categories
  • BPXW-Z300 has lower Weight (580 g vs 1960 g)
  • BPXW-Z300 has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)
  • BPXW-Z300 has higher ISO max (native) (51,200 vs 25,600)
  • BPXW-Z300 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
  • APXW-Z200 has higher Resolution (14 MP vs 8.3 MP)

Key specs at a glance

PXW-Z200PXW-Z300
Resolution14 MP8.3 MP
Sensor13.2 × 8.8 mmMFT
ISO max25,60051,200
Burst20 fps30 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBISNo8-stop
Weight1960 g580 g
Battery640 shots520 shots

Size and weight, to scale

PXW-Z200

176 × 201 × 371 mm

1960 g (4.32 lb / 69.14 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

PXW-Z300

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

PXW-Z200 is 42mm wider, 110mm taller, and 299mm thicker than PXW-Z300.

PXW-Z200 is 1380 g heavier than PXW-Z300.

Depth (front-to-back): 371mm PXW-Z200 · 72mm PXW-Z300

Sensor size, to scale

PXW-Z200

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1″

116 mm² area

PXW-Z300

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

1.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use casePXW-Z200PXW-Z300
Portrait
3.0Limited
4.0Fair✓ wins
Sports & Action
7.0Good
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
5.0Fair
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
1.0Limited
3.5Limited✓ wins
Travel
3.0Limited
7.0Good✓ wins
Wildlife
7.5Good
10.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
4.0Fair
7.0Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

PXW-Z200

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC MXF, XAVC S-I, XAVC HS…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 175.6, 201.3, 371.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Resolution

    14 MP vs 8.3 MP — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 520 shots — higher is better

Reasons to choose

PXW-Z300

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264, ProRes

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134, 91, 72

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II

  • Weight

    580 g vs 1960 g — lower is better

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    51,200 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only PXW-Z300 supports it

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 94 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

PXW-Z200

Pros

  • 12G-SDI + timecode in/out for broadcast
  • XAVC MXF / XAVC S-I / XAVC HS codecs
  • AI subject recognition AF + auto framing
  • 4K up to 60p / 120p slow motion
  • Variable ND (1/4–1/128) + S-Cinetone

Cons

  • Premium over HXR-NX800
  • Heavy at 1.96 kg body-only
  • Some MXF features require firmware 2.0+
  • C3 Portal streaming is paid add-on

PXW-Z300

Pros

  • 3× 1/2-inch 4K Exmor R 3CMOS
  • 17x f/1.9 constant aperture zoom
  • AI subject recognition + auto framing
  • 4K60p XAVC Intra/Long + MPEG HD422
  • Electronic variable ND + 12G-SDI

Cons

  • Premium flagship pricing
  • 3CMOS not single large sensor
  • Heavy at 2.6 kg body-only
  • New platform learning curve

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the PXW-Z200 and PXW-Z300 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

PXW-Z200
PXW-Z300
Resolution
14 MP+69%
8.3 MP
Sensor type
1.0-type stacked Exmor RS CMOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
13.2 × 8.8 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
PXW-Z200
PXW-Z300
Aperture
f/2.8–4.5
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
24–480 mm (35mm equivalent)
PXW-Z200
PXW-Z300
Processor
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
PXW-Z200
PXW-Z300
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
51,200+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
PXW-Z200
PXW-Z300
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/32000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for video, PXW-Z200 or PXW-Z300?

PXW-Z300 scores 9.5/10 versus 5.0/10 for PXW-Z200 — 8K recording for future-proof footage.

What's the resolution difference between the PXW-Z200 and PXW-Z300?

PXW-Z200 is 14 MP and PXW-Z300 is 8.3 MP, so the PXW-Z200 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the PXW-Z200 and PXW-Z300 have in-body image stabilization?

PXW-Z200 does not have IBIS, while PXW-Z300 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the PXW-Z200 or the PXW-Z300?

PXW-Z200 reaches 20 fps electronic. PXW-Z300 reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the PXW-Z200 and PXW-Z300?

PXW-Z200 weighs 1960 g and PXW-Z300 weighs 580 g, so the PXW-Z300 is 1380 g lighter.

Do the PXW-Z200 and PXW-Z300 record 4K video?

PXW-Z200: 4K up to 60p. PXW-Z300: 8K / 6K (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the PXW-Z200 and PXW-Z300 weather sealed?

PXW-Z200: No. PXW-Z300: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the PXW-Z200 and 520 shots for the PXW-Z300, giving the PXW-Z200 the edge.

How much does each cost?

PXW-Z200 launched at $3,999 and PXW-Z300 at $8,298. The PXW-Z200 is $4,299 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way PXW-Z200 vs PXW-Z300 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.