Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Panasonic

HC-X2

1-inch 15MP pro camcorder with 20x 24.5–490mm zoom, 4K60p 10-bit, 13-stop V-Log/HLG, triple manual rings, and RTMP streaming.

$3,399

Launch price

Released Oct 2022

vs

Sony

PXW-Z200

AI-powered XDCAM with 1-inch Exmor RS sensor, 20x G Lens zoom, 4K60/120p, 12G-SDI, XAVC MXF, variable ND, and RTMP/SRT streaming.

$3,999

Launch price

Released Sep 2024

PXW-Z200 is 1.9 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

2categories

HC-X2

WildlifeSports & Action

Wins

1categories

PXW-Z200

WildlifeSports & Action

13 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

HC-X2 wins 2 categories·PXW-Z200 wins 1 categories
  • AHC-X2 has lower Weight (580 g vs 1960 g)
  • AHC-X2 has higher Resolution (15 MP vs 14 MP)
  • BPXW-Z200 has higher AF frame coverage (94 % vs 90 %)

Key specs at a glance

HC-X2PXW-Z200
Resolution15 MP14 MP
SensorMFT13.2 × 8.8 mm
ISO max25,60025,600
Burst20 fps20 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS7-stopNo
Weight580 g1960 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

HC-X2

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

PXW-Z200

176 × 201 × 371 mm

1960 g (4.32 lb / 69.14 oz)

HC-X2 is 42mm narrower, 110mm shorter, and 299mm thinner than PXW-Z200.

HC-X2 is 1380 g lighter than PXW-Z200.

Depth (front-to-back): 72mm HC-X2 · 371mm PXW-Z200

Sensor size, to scale

HC-X2

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

PXW-Z200

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1″

116 mm² area

1.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseHC-X2PXW-Z200
Portrait
4.0Fair✓ wins
3.0Limited
Sports & Action
7.5Good✓ wins
7.0Good
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Landscape
3.5Limited✓ wins
1.0Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
3.0Limited
Wildlife
9.0Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Vlogging
7.0Good✓ wins
4.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

HC-X2

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264, ProRes

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134, 91, 72

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • Weight

    580 g vs 1960 g — lower is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only HC-X2 supports it

  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)

    Only HC-X2 supports it

  • Weather sealing

    Only HC-X2 supports it

  • Resolution

    15 MP vs 14 MP — higher is better

Reasons to choose

PXW-Z200

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC MXF, XAVC S-I, XAVC HS…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 175.6, 201.3, 371.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • AF frame coverage

    94 % vs 90 % — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 25,600
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 8 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

HC-X2

Pros

  • 1-inch 15MP MOS sensor
  • 4K60p 10-bit HEVC/LongG
  • 13-stop V-Log + HLG HDR
  • Triple manual focus/zoom/iris rings
  • Ethernet RTMP + dual XLR handle

Cons

  • No SDI (HDMI only)
  • Premium over HC-X1600
  • Fixed lens only
  • Heavier than HC-X1200 series

PXW-Z200

Pros

  • 12G-SDI + timecode in/out for broadcast
  • XAVC MXF / XAVC S-I / XAVC HS codecs
  • AI subject recognition AF + auto framing
  • 4K up to 60p / 120p slow motion
  • Variable ND (1/4–1/128) + S-Cinetone

Cons

  • Premium over HXR-NX800
  • Heavy at 1.96 kg body-only
  • Some MXF features require firmware 2.0+
  • C3 Portal streaming is paid add-on

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the HC-X2 and PXW-Z200 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

HC-X2
PXW-Z200
Resolution
15 MP+7%
14 MP
Sensor type
Four Thirds Live MOS
1.0-type stacked Exmor RS CMOS
Sensor size
17.3 × 13.0 mm
13.2 × 8.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
HC-X2
PXW-Z200
Aperture
f/2.8–4.5
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
24–480 mm (35mm equivalent)
HC-X2
PXW-Z200
Processor
Venus Engine
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
HC-X2
PXW-Z200
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
HC-X2
PXW-Z200
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for travel, HC-X2 or PXW-Z200?

HC-X2 scores 7.5/10 versus 3.0/10 for PXW-Z200 — 580g — compact and travel-friendly.

What's the resolution difference between the HC-X2 and PXW-Z200?

HC-X2 is 15 MP and PXW-Z200 is 14 MP, so the HC-X2 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the HC-X2 and PXW-Z200 have in-body image stabilization?

HC-X2 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while PXW-Z200 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the HC-X2 or the PXW-Z200?

HC-X2 reaches 20 fps electronic. PXW-Z200 reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the HC-X2 and PXW-Z200?

HC-X2 weighs 580 g and PXW-Z200 weighs 1960 g, so the HC-X2 is 1380 g lighter.

Do the HC-X2 and PXW-Z200 record 4K video?

HC-X2: 4K up to 60p. PXW-Z200: 4K up to 60p.

Are the HC-X2 and PXW-Z200 weather sealed?

HC-X2: Yes. PXW-Z200: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the HC-X2 and 640 shots for the PXW-Z200, giving the PXW-Z200 the edge.

How much does each cost?

HC-X2 launched at $3,399 and PXW-Z200 at $3,999. The HC-X2 is $600 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way HC-X2 vs PXW-Z200 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.