Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Sony

PXW-Z200

AI-powered XDCAM with 1-inch Exmor RS sensor, 20x G Lens zoom, 4K60/120p, 12G-SDI, XAVC MXF, variable ND, and RTMP/SRT streaming.

$3,999

Launch price

Released Sep 2024

vs

Sony

PXW-Z90

Palm-sized XDCAM with 1-inch Exmor RS sensor, 12x Zeiss zoom, Fast Hybrid AF, 3G-SDI, dual XLR, and XAVC 4K up to 30p.

$2,799

Launch price

Released Dec 2017

PXW-Z200 is 6.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

0categories

PXW-Z200

WildlifeSports & Action

Wins

2categories

PXW-Z90

WildlifeSports & Action

14 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

PXW-Z200 wins 0 categories·PXW-Z90 wins 2 categories
  • BPXW-Z90 has lower Weight (580 g vs 1960 g)
  • BPXW-Z90 has higher Resolution (14.2 MP vs 14 MP)

Key specs at a glance

PXW-Z200PXW-Z90
Resolution14 MP14.2 MP
Sensor13.2 × 8.8 mmMFT
ISO max25,60025,600
Burst20 fps20 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBISNo7-stop
Weight1960 g580 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

PXW-Z200

176 × 201 × 371 mm

1960 g (4.32 lb / 69.14 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

PXW-Z90

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

PXW-Z200 is 42mm wider, 110mm taller, and 299mm thicker than PXW-Z90.

PXW-Z200 is 1380 g heavier than PXW-Z90.

Depth (front-to-back): 371mm PXW-Z200 · 72mm PXW-Z90

Sensor size, to scale

PXW-Z200

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1″

116 mm² area

PXW-Z90

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

1.9× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use casePXW-Z200PXW-Z90
Portrait
3.0Limited
4.0Fair✓ wins
Sports & Action
7.0Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
5.0Fair
7.5Good✓ wins
Landscape
1.0Limited
3.5Limited✓ wins
Travel
3.0Limited
7.5Good✓ wins
Wildlife
7.5Good
9.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
4.0Fair
7.0Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

PXW-Z200

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC MXF, XAVC S-I, XAVC HS…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 175.6, 201.3, 371.1

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

Reasons to choose

PXW-Z90

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264, ProRes

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134, 91, 72

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • Weight

    580 g vs 1960 g — lower is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only PXW-Z90 supports it

  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)

    Only PXW-Z90 supports it

  • Weather sealing

    Only PXW-Z90 supports it

  • Resolution

    14.2 MP vs 14 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 25,600
  • AF frame coverageBoth 94 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

PXW-Z200

Pros

  • 12G-SDI + timecode in/out for broadcast
  • XAVC MXF / XAVC S-I / XAVC HS codecs
  • AI subject recognition AF + auto framing
  • 4K up to 60p / 120p slow motion
  • Variable ND (1/4–1/128) + S-Cinetone

Cons

  • Premium over HXR-NX800
  • Heavy at 1.96 kg body-only
  • Some MXF features require firmware 2.0+
  • C3 Portal streaming is paid add-on

PXW-Z90

Pros

  • 1-inch stacked Exmor RS (14.2MP)
  • 273-point Fast Hybrid AF
  • Built-in ND (1/4, 1/16, 1/64)
  • 3G-SDI + dual XLR handle
  • S-Log3 / HLG / S-Cinetone

Cons

  • 4K limited to 30p
  • Small palm body ergonomics
  • XAVC 100Mbps max in 4K
  • Superseded by newer NX800/Z200 line

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the PXW-Z200 and PXW-Z90 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

PXW-Z200
PXW-Z90
Resolution
14 MP
14.2 MP+1%
Sensor type
1.0-type stacked Exmor RS CMOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
13.2 × 8.8 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
PXW-Z200
PXW-Z90
Aperture
f/2.8–4.5
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
24–480 mm (35mm equivalent)
PXW-Z200
PXW-Z90
Processor
BIONZ XR + AI processing unit
BIONZ X
PXW-Z200
PXW-Z90
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
PXW-Z200
PXW-Z90
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for travel, PXW-Z200 or PXW-Z90?

PXW-Z90 scores 7.5/10 versus 3.0/10 for PXW-Z200 — 580g — compact and travel-friendly.

What's the resolution difference between the PXW-Z200 and PXW-Z90?

PXW-Z200 is 14 MP and PXW-Z90 is 14.2 MP, so the PXW-Z90 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the PXW-Z200 and PXW-Z90 have in-body image stabilization?

PXW-Z200 does not have IBIS, while PXW-Z90 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the PXW-Z200 or the PXW-Z90?

PXW-Z200 reaches 20 fps electronic. PXW-Z90 reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the PXW-Z200 and PXW-Z90?

PXW-Z200 weighs 1960 g and PXW-Z90 weighs 580 g, so the PXW-Z90 is 1380 g lighter.

Do the PXW-Z200 and PXW-Z90 record 4K video?

PXW-Z200: 4K up to 60p. PXW-Z90: 4K up to 60p.

Are the PXW-Z200 and PXW-Z90 weather sealed?

PXW-Z200: No. PXW-Z90: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the PXW-Z200 and 640 shots for the PXW-Z90, giving the PXW-Z90 the edge.

How much does each cost?

PXW-Z200 launched at $3,999 and PXW-Z90 at $2,799. The PXW-Z90 is $1,200 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way PXW-Z200 vs PXW-Z90 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.