Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Ricoh

GR

Original APS-C GR with 16MP sensor and 28mm equivalent lens — the pocket street camera that started it all.

$799

Launch price

Released Apr 2013

vs

Ricoh

GR III

Street photography icon with 24.24MP APS-C, 28mm equivalent GR lens, 3-axis SR, and snap-focus in a pocket body.

$899

Launch price

Released Mar 2019

GR III is 5.9 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

5categories

GR

VloggingTravel

Wins

2categories

GR III

PortraitVlogging

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

GR wins 4 categories·GR III wins 1 categories
  • BGR III has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AGR has higher Burst (electronic) (15 fps vs 4 fps)
  • AGR has higher Battery life (CIPA) (640 shots vs 200 shots)
  • AGR has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
  • AGR has higher Burst (mechanical) (6 fps vs 4 fps)

Key specs at a glance

GRGR III
Resolution16.2 MP24.24 MP
SensorAPS-CAPS-C
ISO max25,600102,400
Burst15 fps4 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS6-stopYes
Weight245 g257 g
Battery640 shots200 shots

Size and weight, to scale

GR

117 × 61 × 35 mm

245 g (0.54 lb / 8.64 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

GR III

109 × 62 × 33 mm

257 g (0.57 lb / 9.07 oz)

GR is 1mm shorter than GR III but it is also 8mm wider and 1mm thicker.

GR is 12 g lighter than GR III.

Depth (front-to-back): 35mm GR · 33mm GR III

Sensor size, to scale

GR

23.7 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

372 mm² area

GR III

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGRGR III
Portrait
5.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
5.5Fair✓ wins
1.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Landscape
2.0Limited
2.5Limited✓ wins
Travel
6.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
2.0Limited
Vlogging
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GR

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 117, 61, 34.5

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II

  • Burst (electronic)

    15 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    640 shots vs 200 shots — higher is better

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only GR supports it

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only GR supports it

Reasons to choose

GR III

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face, Eye

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264, MOV

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.9, 33.2

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Resolution

    24.24 MP vs 16.2 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF points / zonesBoth 49
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GR

Pros

  • Original GR formula
  • APS-C in pocket
  • 28mm GR lens
  • Snap focus culture

Cons

  • 16MP dated
  • No IBIS
  • Fixed lens

GR III

Pros

  • Pocketable APS-C
  • 28mm equivalent GR lens
  • 3-axis sensor-shift SR
  • Snap focus street shooting

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • No built-in EVF
  • Full HD video only

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the GR and GR III at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

GR
GR III
Resolution
16.2 MP
24.24 MP+50%
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
23.7 × 15.7 mm
23.5 x 15.6 mm
AA filter
No
No
GR
GR III
Aperture
F2.8-F16
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
28 mm
GR
GR III
Processor
Image processor
GR ENGINE 6
GR
GR III
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
102,400+2 stops
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
GR
GR III
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Leaf shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, GR or GR III?

GR scores 6.5/10 versus 2.0/10 for GR III — Bird AF subject recognition.

What's the resolution difference between the GR and GR III?

GR is 16.2 MP and GR III is 24.24 MP, so the GR III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the GR and GR III have in-body image stabilization?

GR has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while GR III has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the GR or the GR III?

GR reaches 15 fps electronic. GR III reaches 4 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the GR and GR III?

GR weighs 245 g and GR III weighs 257 g, so the GR is 12 g lighter.

Do the GR and GR III record 4K video?

GR: 4K up to 60p. GR III: 4K up to 60p.

Are the GR and GR III weather sealed?

GR: No. GR III: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the GR and 200 shots for the GR III, giving the GR the edge.

How much does each cost?

GR launched at $799 and GR III at $899. The GR is $100 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way GR vs GR III vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.