Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Ricoh

GR II

Classic APS-C GR with 16.2MP sensor, 28mm equivalent lens, built-in flash, Wi-Fi, and snap-focus street ergonomics.

$799

Launch price

Released Jun 2015

vs

Ricoh

GR III

Street photography icon with 24.24MP APS-C, 28mm equivalent GR lens, 3-axis SR, and snap-focus in a pocket body.

$899

Launch price

Released Mar 2019

GR III is 3.8 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

2categories

GR II

Wins

3categories

GR III

PortraitVlogging

5 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

GR II wins 2 categories·GR III wins 3 categories
  • BGR III has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • BGR III has higher 1080p max frame rate (60 fps vs 30 fps)
  • AGR II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (320 shots vs 200 shots)
  • BGR III has higher Resolution (24.24 MP vs 16.2 MP)
  • AGR II has lower Weight (251 g vs 257 g)

Key specs at a glance

GR IIGR III
Resolution16.2 MP24.24 MP
SensorAPS-CAPS-C
ISO max25,600102,400
Burst4 fps4 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBISNoYes
Weight251 g257 g
Battery320 shots200 shots

Size and weight, to scale

GR II

117 × 63 × 35 mm

251 g (0.55 lb / 8.85 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

GR III

109 × 62 × 33 mm

257 g (0.57 lb / 9.07 oz)

GR II is 8mm wider, 1mm taller, and 2mm thicker than GR III.

GR II is 6 g lighter than GR III.

Depth (front-to-back): 35mm GR II · 33mm GR III

Sensor size, to scale

GR II

23.7 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

372 mm² area

GR III

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGR IIGR III
Portrait
2.5Limited
6.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
1.0Limited
1.5Limited✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
2.5Limited
3.5Limited✓ wins
Landscape
0.0Limited
2.5Limited✓ wins
Travel
4.5Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins
Wildlife
0.0Limited
2.0Limited✓ wins
Vlogging
3.5Limited
6.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GR II

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 117, 62.8, 34.7

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    320 shots vs 200 shots — higher is better

  • Weight

    251 g vs 257 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

GR III

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.9, 33.2

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Eye AF

    Only GR III supports it

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Eye

  • 1080p max frame rate

    60 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds MOV

  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)

    Only GR III supports it

  • Touchscreen

    Only GR III supports it

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 4 fps
  • Burst (electronic)Both 4 fps
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GR II

Pros

  • APS-C sensor
  • 28mm GR lens
  • Built-in flash
  • Great used value

Cons

  • Older 16MP sensor
  • No IBIS
  • Fixed lens

GR III

Pros

  • Pocketable APS-C
  • 28mm equivalent GR lens
  • 3-axis sensor-shift SR
  • Snap focus street shooting

Cons

  • Fixed lens
  • No built-in EVF
  • Full HD video only

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the GR II and GR III at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

GR II
GR III
Resolution
16.2 MP
24.24 MP+50%
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
23.7 x 15.7 mm
23.5 x 15.6 mm
AA filter
No
No
GR II
GR III
Aperture
F2.8-F16
F2.8-F16
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
28 mm
28 mm
GR II
GR III
Processor
GR ENGINE V
GR ENGINE 6
GR II
GR III
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
102,400+2 stops
ISO max (expanded)
25,600
102,400
GR II
GR III
Shutter type
Leaf shutter
Leaf shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, GR II or GR III?

GR III scores 6.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for GR II — 24.24MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the GR II and GR III?

GR II is 16.2 MP and GR III is 24.24 MP, so the GR III captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the GR II and GR III have in-body image stabilization?

GR II does not have IBIS, while GR III has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the GR II or the GR III?

GR II reaches 4 fps electronic. GR III reaches 4 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the GR II and GR III?

GR II weighs 251 g and GR III weighs 257 g, so the GR II is 6 g lighter.

Do the GR II and GR III record 4K video?

GR II: 4K up to 60p. GR III: 4K up to 60p.

Are the GR II and GR III weather sealed?

GR II: No. GR III: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 320 shots (CIPA) for the GR II and 200 shots for the GR III, giving the GR II the edge.

How much does each cost?

GR II launched at $799 and GR III at $899. The GR II is $100 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way GR II vs GR III vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.