Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Sigma

fp L

World's smallest full-frame interchangeable camera with 61MP and L-mount.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Jul 2021

vs

Z CAM

E2-M4

Compact MFT cinema box with 4K 120p, ZRAW, ProRes, and interchangeable MFT lenses.

$1,299

Launch price

Released Jun 2023

E2-M4 is 1.9 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

1categories

fp L

LandscapePortrait

Wins

6categories

E2-M4

Sports & ActionVideo & Hybrid

11 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

fp L wins 1 categories·E2-M4 wins 4 categories
  • BE2-M4 has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
  • Afp L has higher Resolution (61 MP vs 10.28 MP)
  • BE2-M4 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
  • BE2-M4 has lower Weight (370 g vs 720 g)
  • BE2-M4 has higher Max video bit rate (200 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)

Key specs at a glance

fp LE2-M4
Resolution61 MP10.28 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max25,60025,600
Burst15 fps15 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBIS6-stop6-stop
Weight720 g370 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

fp L

138 × 98 × 88 mm

720 g (1.59 lb / 25.40 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

E2-M4

91 × 66 × 72 mm

370 g (0.82 lb / 13.05 oz)

fp L is 47mm wider, 32mm taller, and 16mm thicker than E2-M4.

fp L is 350 g heavier than E2-M4.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm fp L · 72mm E2-M4

Sensor size, to scale

fp L

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

E2-M4

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

fp L: mount data unavailable

E2-M4

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use casefp LE2-M4
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
6.5Good
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
9.0Excellent✓ wins
3.5Limited
Travel
6.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
8.0Excellent
8.0Excellent
Vlogging
5.5Fair
7.5Good✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

fp L

  • Codecs

    Adds H.265, H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98, 88

  • Resolution

    61 MP vs 10.28 MP — higher is better

Reasons to choose

E2-M4

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -5 EV — lower is better

  • Codecs

    Adds ZRAW, ProRes

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 91, 66, 72

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 49 — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only E2-M4 supports it

  • Weight

    370 g vs 720 g — lower is better

  • Max video bit rate

    200 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 25,600
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 6 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

fp L

Pros

  • Tiny full-frame
  • 61MP
  • L-mount
  • Unique industrial design

Cons

  • No IBIS
  • Small battery
  • Minimal ergonomics

E2-M4

Pros

  • Tiny MFT cinema box
  • 4K 120p
  • ZRAW internal
  • Affordable cinema entry

Cons

  • No screen
  • MFT sensor
  • Manual focus workflow

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the fp L and E2-M4 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

fp L
E2-M4
Resolution
61 MP5.9× more
10.28 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Four Thirds CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
fp L
E2-M4
Processor
Image processor
Image processor
fp L
E2-M4
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
102,400
102,400
fp L
E2-M4
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, fp L or E2-M4?

fp L scores 9.0/10 versus 3.5/10 for E2-M4 — 61MP — massive detail for large prints.

What's the resolution difference between the fp L and E2-M4?

fp L is 61 MP and E2-M4 is 10.28 MP, so the fp L captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the fp L and E2-M4 have in-body image stabilization?

fp L has 6-stop in-body image stabilization, while E2-M4 has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the fp L or the E2-M4?

fp L reaches 15 fps electronic. E2-M4 reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the fp L and E2-M4?

fp L weighs 720 g and E2-M4 weighs 370 g, so the E2-M4 is 350 g lighter.

Do the fp L and E2-M4 record 4K video?

fp L: 4K up to 60p. E2-M4: 4K up to 120p.

Are the fp L and E2-M4 weather sealed?

fp L: Yes. E2-M4: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the fp L and 640 shots for the E2-M4, giving the E2-M4 the edge.

How much does each cost?

fp L launched at $2,499 and E2-M4 at $1,299. The E2-M4 is $1,200 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way fp L vs E2-M4 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.