Fujifilm
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm GFX Mount
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR — 100–200mm f/5.6 for Fujifilm GFX, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$1,999
Launch priceReleased Feb 2021
Sony
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Sony E Mount
The ultimate standard zoom — incredibly sharp, exceptionally compact, and built for professionals.
$2,299
Launch priceReleased Apr 2022
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II is 1.2 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Wins
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AGF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- BFE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II has lower Min focus distance (21 cm vs 75 cm)
- BFE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/5.6)
- BFE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/5.6)
- BFE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II has higher Max magnification (0.32 × vs 0.2 ×)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareGF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
⌀89 × 183 mm
1050 g (2.31 lb / 37.04 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
⌀88 × 120 mm
695 g (1.53 lb / 24.52 oz)
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR is 63mm longer and 1mm wider than FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II.
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR is 355 g heavier than FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 Aspherical, 1 Super ED
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR supports it
Reasons to choose the FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 XA (extreme aspherical), 3 Aspherical, 2 Super ED
- ✓
Min focus distance
21 cm vs 75 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/5.6 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/5.6 — lower is better
- ✓
Length
120 mm vs 183 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
695 g vs 1050 g — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.32 × vs 0.2 × — higher is better
- ✓
Diameter
88 mm vs 89 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Custom function button
Both support custom function button
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Pros
- ✓Outstanding sharpness across the entire zoom range
- ✓Remarkably small and lightweight for an f/2.8 zoom
- ✓Four XD Linear focus motors provide blazing-fast AF tracking
- ✓Excellent close-up magnification
- ✓De-clickable aperture ring and customized function buttons
Cons
- –No built-in optical image stabilization (relies on body IBIS)
- –High launch price
- –Aperture ring can be easily bumped if not locked
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR and FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM II
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.