Fujifilm
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm GFX Mount
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR — 100–200mm f/5.6 for Fujifilm GFX, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$1,999
Launch priceReleased Feb 2021
Sony
FE 50mm F1.2 GM
Sony E Mount
Exquisite resolution and dreamy bokeh combine in a masterful f/1.2 prime.
$1,999
Launch priceReleased Mar 2021
Released within a month of each other.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Wins
FE 50mm F1.2 GM
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AGF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 0 stops)
- BFE 50mm F1.2 GM has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.2 vs f/5.6)
- BFE 50mm F1.2 GM has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.2 vs f/5.6)
- BFE 50mm F1.2 GM has lower Min focus distance (40 cm vs 75 cm)
- BFE 50mm F1.2 GM has lower Length (108 mm vs 183 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareGF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
⌀89 × 183 mm
1050 g (2.31 lb / 37.04 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
FE 50mm F1.2 GM
⌀87 × 108 mm
778 g (1.72 lb / 27.44 oz)
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR is 75mm longer and 2mm wider than FE 50mm F1.2 GM.
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR is 272 g heavier than FE 50mm F1.2 GM.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 Aspherical, 2 ED, 1 Super ED
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Optical stabilization
Only GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR supports it
- ✓
Max magnification
0.2 × vs 0.17 × — higher is better
Reasons to choose the FE 50mm F1.2 GM
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 3 XA (extreme aspherical)
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.2 vs f/5.6 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.2 vs f/5.6 — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
40 cm vs 75 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Length
108 mm vs 183 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
778 g vs 1050 g — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
87 mm vs 89 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Custom function button
Both support custom function button
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
FE 50mm F1.2 GM
Pros
- ✓Outstanding sharpness wide open at f/1.2
- ✓Stunningly smooth, circular bokeh with 11 aperture blades
- ✓Extremely quiet and fast autofocus tracking
- ✓Manageable size and weight for an f/1.2 lens
Cons
- –Expensive investment for a single focal length
- –Heavy compared to standard f/1.8 options
- –Some visible vignetting wide open
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR and FE 50mm F1.2 GM at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Sony FE 50mm F1.2 GM
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.