Fujifilm
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm GFX Mount
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR — 100–200mm f/5.6 for Fujifilm GFX, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$1,999
Launch priceReleased Feb 2021
Sony
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
Sony E Mount
The standard telephoto zoom, completely redesigned to be 29% lighter and significantly sharper.
$2,799
Launch priceReleased Oct 2021
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II is 8 months newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Wins
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BFE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/5.6)
- BFE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/5.6)
- BFE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II has lower Min focus distance (40 cm vs 75 cm)
- BFE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II has higher Max magnification (0.3 × vs 0.2 ×)
- AGF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR has higher OIS effectiveness (5 stops vs 4.5 stops)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareGF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
⌀89 × 183 mm
1050 g (2.31 lb / 37.04 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
⌀88 × 200 mm
1045 g (2.30 lb / 36.86 oz)
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR is 17mm shorter and 1mm wider than FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II.
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR is 5 g heavier than FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
- ✓
Control ring
Only GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR supports it
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5 stops vs 4.5 stops — higher is better
- ✓
Length
183 mm vs 200 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/5.6 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/5.6 — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
40 cm vs 75 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 XA
- ✓
Max magnification
0.3 × vs 0.2 × — higher is better
- ✓
Diameter
88 mm vs 89 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
1045 g vs 1050 g — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Optical stabilization
Both support optical stabilization
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Custom function button
Both support custom function button
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
Pros
- ✓Extremely lightweight for an f/2.8 telephoto zoom (only 1045g)
- ✓Virtually instantaneous and silent autofocus with 4 XD Linear motors
- ✓Stunning optical performance and contrast across entire range
- ✓Outstanding built-in Optical SteadyShot stabilization
- ✓Dedicated physical aperture ring with click and lock switches
Cons
- –Very high price tag
- –Lens hood is bulky and can block storage space easily
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR and FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Sony FE 70-200mm F2.8 GM OSS II
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.