Fujifilm
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm GFX Mount
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR — 100–200mm f/5.6 for Fujifilm GFX, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$1,999
Launch priceReleased Feb 2021
Fujifilm
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm X Mount
762mm-equiv. super-telephoto at only 1335g with 5.5-stop OIS and linear AF.
$3,699
Launch priceReleased Oct 2024
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR is 3.7 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Wins
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
3 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AGF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR has lower Min focus distance (75 cm vs 275 cm)
- AGF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR has lower Length (183 mm vs 255.5 mm)
- AGF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR has lower Weight (1050 g vs 1335 g)
- AGF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR has lower Diameter (89 mm vs 104.5 mm)
- BXF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR has higher OIS effectiveness (5.5 stops vs 5 stops)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to shareGF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
⌀89 × 183 mm
1050 g (2.31 lb / 37.04 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
⌀105 × 256 mm
1335 g (2.94 lb / 47.09 oz)
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR is 73mm shorter and 16mm narrower than XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR.
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR is 285 g lighter than XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 Aspherical, 2 ED, 1 Super ED
- ✓
Min focus distance
75 cm vs 275 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Length
183 mm vs 255.5 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Weight
1050 g vs 1335 g — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
89 mm vs 104.5 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 5 ED, 2 Super ED
- ✓
OIS effectiveness
5.5 stops vs 5 stops — higher is better
Shared specifications
Max aperture (Wide)
Both f/5.6
Max aperture (Tele)
Both f/5.6
Max magnification
Both 0.2 ×
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Optical stabilization
Both support optical stabilization
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR and XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm GF 100-200mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm XF 500mm F5.6 R LM OIS WR
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.