Fujifilm
XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR
Fujifilm X Mount
XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR — 10–24mm f/4 for Fujifilm X, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$999
Launch priceReleased Oct 2020
Fujifilm
XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR
Fujifilm X Mount
XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR — 50–140mm f/2.8 for Fujifilm X, a popular choice in the fujifilm lineup.
$1,599
Launch priceReleased Jun 2014
XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR is 6.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR
Wins
XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AXF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR has lower Weight (385 g vs 995 g)
- AXF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR has lower Length (87 mm vs 189 mm)
- AXF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR has lower Min focus distance (24 cm vs 38 cm)
- BXF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR has higher Max magnification (0.25 × vs 0.16 ×)
- BXF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to share
XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR
⌀78 × 87 mm
385 g (0.85 lb / 13.58 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR
⌀70 × 189 mm
995 g (2.19 lb / 35.10 oz)
XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR is 102mm shorter and 8mm wider than XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR.
XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR is 610 g lighter than XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR
- ✓
Weight
385 g vs 995 g — lower is better
- ✓
Length
87 mm vs 189 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
24 cm vs 38 cm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR
- ✓
Custom function button
Only XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR supports it
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
70 mm vs 77.6 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Max magnification
0.25 × vs 0.16 × — higher is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Optical stabilization
Both support optical stabilization
OIS effectiveness
Both 5 stops
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Built-in optical image stabilization
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR and XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR at major authorized retailers.
Fujifilm XF 10-24mm F4 R OIS WR
Fujifilm XF 50-140mm F2.8 R LM OIS WR
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.