OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
Micro Four Thirds Mount
50mm-equiv. F1.2 standard prime with 19-element design, 30 cm close focus, and IPX1 weather sealing.
$1,199
Launch priceReleased Nov 2017
OM System
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO
Micro Four Thirds Mount
Lightweight 40–150mm travel telephoto with F4 constant aperture and IP53 sealing.
$699
Launch priceReleased Feb 2020
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO is 2.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
Wins
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/1.2 vs f/4)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/1.2 vs f/4)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO has lower Min focus distance (30 cm vs 70 cm)
- BM.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO has higher Max magnification (0.21 × vs 0.11 ×)
- AM.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO has lower Length (87 mm vs 99.9 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to share
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
⌀70 × 87 mm
410 g (0.90 lb / 14.46 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO
⌀69 × 100 mm
382 g (0.84 lb / 13.47 oz)
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO is 13mm shorter and 2mm wider than M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO is 28 g heavier than M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 1 Aspherical, 1 DSA, 3 ED
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/1.2 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/1.2 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
30 cm vs 70 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Control ring
Only M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO supports it
- ✓
Length
87 mm vs 99.9 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 Aspherical, 2 ED, 1 HR
- ✓
Max magnification
0.21 × vs 0.11 × — higher is better
- ✓
Weight
382 g vs 410 g — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
68.5 mm vs 70 mm — lower is better
Shared specifications
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
Pros
- ✓Bright f/1.2 aperture for low light and subject separation
- ✓Prime design typically delivers strong sharpness and lighter weight
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
Cons
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Lightweight design easy to carry all day
- ✓Native Micro Four Thirds mount compatibility
Cons
- –No optical stabilization — relies on body IBIS
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO and M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO at major authorized retailers.
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 25mm F1.2 PRO
OM System M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm F4 PRO
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.