Panasonic
LUMIX S 16-35mm F4
Leica L Mount
LUMIX S 16-35mm F4 — 16–35mm f/4 for Leica L, a popular choice in the panasonic lineup.
$1,299
Launch priceReleased Jan 2023
Panasonic
LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8
Leica L Mount
LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8 — 24–70mm f/2.8 for Leica L, a popular choice in the panasonic lineup.
$2,199
Launch priceReleased Oct 2019
LUMIX S 16-35mm F4 is 3.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
LUMIX S 16-35mm F4
Wins
LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8
2 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- ALUMIX S 16-35mm F4 has lower Weight (493 g vs 935 g)
- ALUMIX S 16-35mm F4 has lower Min focus distance (25 cm vs 37 cm)
- BLUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8 has lower Max aperture (Wide) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
- BLUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8 has lower Max aperture (Tele) (f/2.8 vs f/4)
- ALUMIX S 16-35mm F4 has lower Length (105.4 mm vs 140 mm)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this lens size diff to share
LUMIX S 16-35mm F4
⌀74 × 105 mm
493 g (1.09 lb / 17.39 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8
⌀91 × 140 mm
935 g (2.06 lb / 32.98 oz)
LUMIX S 16-35mm F4 is 35mm shorter and 17mm narrower than LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8.
LUMIX S 16-35mm F4 is 442 g lighter than LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8.
Diameter (⌀) is the maximum barrel width; length is measured from the mount to the front of the lens.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose the LUMIX S 16-35mm F4
- ✓
Special elements
Adds 2 Aspherical, 1 ED
- ✓
Weight
493 g vs 935 g — lower is better
- ✓
Min focus distance
25 cm vs 37 cm — lower is better
- ✓
Length
105.4 mm vs 140 mm — lower is better
- ✓
Diameter
73.6 mm vs 90.9 mm — lower is better
Reasons to choose the LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8
- ✓
Special elements
Adds Aspherical
- ✓
Max aperture (Wide)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
- ✓
Max aperture (Tele)
f/2.8 vs f/4 — lower is better
Shared specifications
Max magnification
Both 0.25 ×
Internal focus
Both support internal focus
Weather sealing
Both support weather sealing
Control ring
Both support control ring
Custom function button
Both support custom function button
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
LUMIX S 16-35mm F4
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Leica L mount compatibility
Cons
- –Slower maximum aperture limits low-light performance
- –Third-party or older alternatives may offer better value
LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8
Pros
- ✓Versatile zoom range covers multiple focal lengths in one lens
- ✓Weather-sealed construction for outdoor shooting
- ✓Native Leica L mount compatibility
Cons
- –Premium price point
- –Relatively heavy for extended handheld use
- –No optical stabilization — relies on body IBIS
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the LUMIX S 16-35mm F4 and LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8 at major authorized retailers.
Panasonic LUMIX S 16-35mm F4
Panasonic LUMIX S PRO 24-70mm F2.8
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.