Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Canon

EOS-1D X Mark III

Canon flagship DSLR for sports and news with 20fps and legendary reliability.

$6,499

Launch price

Released Feb 2020

vs
EOS R5

Canon

EOS R5

45MP full-frame hybrid with 8K RAW, 4K 120p, strong AF, and 8-stop in-body stabilization.

$3,899

Launch price

Released Jul 2020

EOS R5 is 5 months newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

6categories

EOS-1D X Mark III

WildlifeSports & Action

Wins

5categories

EOS R5

Video & HybridPortrait

7 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS-1D X Mark III wins 1 categories·EOS R5 wins 4 categories
  • BEOS R5 has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • BEOS R5 has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 191)
  • BEOS R5 has higher Resolution (45 MP vs 20.1 MP)
  • AEOS-1D X Mark III has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 51,200)
  • BEOS R5 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS-1D X Mark IIIEOS R5
Resolution20.1 MP45 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,40051,200
Burst20 fps20 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stop8-stop
Weight720 g738 g
Battery520 shots490 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS-1D X Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

720 g (1.59 lb / 25.40 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

EOS R5 front view

EOS R5

139 × 98 × 88 mm

738 g (1.63 lb / 26.03 oz)

EOS-1D X Mark III is 1mm narrower than EOS R5 but it is also 1mm taller.

EOS-1D X Mark III is 18 g lighter than EOS R5.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS-1D X Mark III · 88mm EOS R5

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS-1D X Mark III

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R5 back view

EOS R5

139 × 98 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS-1D X Mark III

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS R5 top view

EOS R5

139 × 88 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS-1D X Mark III

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

EOS R5

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS-1D X Mark III

✓ more lenses

Canon EF

300+

native lenses available

100 first-party200 third-party

EOS R5

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS-1D X Mark IIIEOS R5
Portrait
6.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Sports & Action
7.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
9.5Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
5.5Fair
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Travel
6.0Good
6.0Good
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Vlogging
5.5Fair
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS-1D X Mark III

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138, 98

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 51,200 — higher is better

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only EOS-1D X Mark III supports it

  • Burst (mechanical)

    16 fps vs 12 fps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    200 frames vs 180 frames — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    520 shots vs 490 shots — higher is better

  • Weight

    720 g vs 738 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

EOS R5

  • AF low-light limit

    -6 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 191 — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.5, 97.5

  • Resolution

    45 MP vs 20.1 MP — higher is better

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only EOS R5 supports it

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Burst (electronic)Both 20 fps
  • Internal RAW videoBoth support internal raw video

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS-1D X Mark III

Pros

  • 20fps DSLR
  • Pro build
  • Dual CFexpress
  • Excellent AF

Cons

  • DSLR platform
  • 20MP
  • Very heavy

EOS R5

Pros

  • 45MP sensor balances resolution and speed
  • 8K RAW and 4K 120p internal video
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II with advanced subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • CFexpress Type B plus SD UHS-II storage

Cons

  • Heat limits can matter for extended high-end video
  • Battery life is modest
  • Still expensive versus newer enthusiast bodies

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS-1D X Mark III and EOS R5 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS-1D X Mark III
EOS R5
Resolution
20.1 MP
45 MP2.2× more
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame CMOS
Sensor size
36.0 × 24.0 mm
36.0 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS-1D X Mark III
EOS R5
Processor
DIGIC X
DIGIC X
EOS-1D X Mark III
EOS R5
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+1 stop
51,200
ISO max (expanded)
819,200
102,400
EOS-1D X Mark III
EOS R5
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/8000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, EOS-1D X Mark III or EOS R5?

EOS-1D X Mark III scores 10.0/10 versus 5.0/10 for EOS R5 — 20fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS-1D X Mark III and EOS R5?

EOS-1D X Mark III is 20.1 MP and EOS R5 is 45 MP, so the EOS R5 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS-1D X Mark III and EOS R5 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS-1D X Mark III has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while EOS R5 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS-1D X Mark III or the EOS R5?

EOS-1D X Mark III reaches 20 fps electronic. EOS R5 reaches 20 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS-1D X Mark III and EOS R5?

EOS-1D X Mark III weighs 720 g and EOS R5 weighs 738 g, so the EOS-1D X Mark III is 18 g lighter.

Do the EOS-1D X Mark III and EOS R5 record 4K video?

EOS-1D X Mark III: 4K up to 60p. EOS R5: 8K RAW (max), 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS-1D X Mark III and EOS R5 weather sealed?

EOS-1D X Mark III: Yes. EOS R5: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 520 shots (CIPA) for the EOS-1D X Mark III and 490 shots for the EOS R5, giving the EOS-1D X Mark III the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS-1D X Mark III launched at $6,499 and EOS R5 at $3,899. The EOS R5 is $2,600 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS-1D X Mark III vs EOS R5 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.