Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs

Canon

EOS Ra

Astrophotography full-frame RF body with Ha-filter enhancement for nebula and deep-sky imaging.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2019

EOS R6 Mark II is 3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

8categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

3categories

EOS Ra

Sports & ActionPortrait

7 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·EOS Ra wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 6 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIEOS Ra
Resolution24.2 MP30.3 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst40 fps15 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop6-stop
Weight670 g660 g
Battery760 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

EOS Ra

136 × 98 × 84 mm

660 g (1.46 lb / 23.28 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 3mm wider and 4mm thicker than EOS Ra.

EOS R6 Mark II is 10 g heavier than EOS Ra.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 84mm EOS Ra

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS Ra

136 × 98 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

EOS Ra

136 × 84 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

EOS Ra

36 × 24 mm · Full Frame

864 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

EOS Ra

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIEOS Ra
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent✓ wins
8.5Excellent
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Landscape
7.0Good
7.5Good✓ wins
Travel
7.5Good
7.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

Reasons to choose

EOS Ra

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 135.8, 98.3, 84.4

  • Resolution

    30.3 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

  • Weight

    660 g vs 670 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF points / zonesBoth 1053
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

EOS Ra

Pros

  • Ha-filter enhanced
  • 30MP full-frame
  • RF mount
  • Built for astro

Cons

  • Niche use case
  • Not ideal for general photography
  • Discontinued

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and EOS Ra at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
EOS Ra
Resolution
24.2 MP
30.3 MP+25%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame CMOS (Ha enhanced)
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
36.0 × 24.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
EOS Ra
Processor
DIGIC X
DIGIC X
EOS R6 Mark II
EOS Ra
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
102,400
EOS R6 Mark II
EOS Ra
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for vlogging, EOS R6 Mark II or EOS Ra?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.0/10 versus 5.5/10 for EOS Ra — Fully articulating screen — see yourself while filming.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and EOS Ra?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and EOS Ra is 30.3 MP, so the EOS Ra captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and EOS Ra have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while EOS Ra has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the EOS Ra?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. EOS Ra reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and EOS Ra?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and EOS Ra weighs 660 g, so the EOS Ra is 10 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and EOS Ra record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. EOS Ra: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and EOS Ra weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. EOS Ra: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 640 shots for the EOS Ra, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

Both launched at $2,499.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs EOS Ra vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon press materials.