Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Fujifilm

X-S20

Creator-friendly APS-C hybrid with vlog features and strong AF.

$1,299

Released May 2023

X-S20 is 6 months newer.

Wins

11categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

4categories

X-S20

WildlifeTravel

3 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·X-S20 wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 12,800)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 425)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 88 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has lower ISO min (native) (100 vs 160)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIX-S20
Resolution24.2 MP26.1 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max102,40012,800
Burst40 fps30 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop7-stop
Weight680 g491 g
Battery760 shots750 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

X-S20

128 × 85 × 65 mm

491 g (1.08 lb / 17.32 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 11mm wider, 13mm taller, and 23mm thicker than X-S20.

EOS R6 Mark II is 189 g heavier than X-S20.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 65mm X-S20

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

X-S20

128 × 85 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

X-S20

128 × 65 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

X-S20

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

X-S20

✓ more lenses

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIX-S20
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
7.5Good
7.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
8.5Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 425 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 88 frames — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • Weather sealing

    Only EOS R6 Mark II supports it

  • Card slots

    2 vs 1 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

X-S20

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animal, Bird, Automobile…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 127.7, 85.1, 65.4

  • AF low-light limit

    -7 EV vs -6.5 EV — lower is better

  • Card types

    Adds SDXC V90

  • Weight

    491 g vs 680 g — lower is better

  • Resolution

    26.1 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    360 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • Internal RAW videoBoth support internal raw video

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

X-S20

Pros

  • Vlog modes
  • IBIS
  • Compact
  • Good battery

Cons

  • 26MP APS-C
  • Not flagship build
  • 4K crop in some modes

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
X-S20
Resolution
24.2 MP
26.1 MP+8%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
APS-C X-Trans CMOS 4
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
23.5 x 15.6 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
X-S20
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
AF points / zones
10532.5× more
425
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-7 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Animal, Bird, Automobile, Motorcycle/Bike, Airplane, Train
EOS R6 Mark II
X-S20
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+50%
8 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps+33%
30 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
180 frames2× more
88 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
X-S20
Max resolution
4K UHD
6.2K
4K max frame rate
60 fps
60 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps
360 Mbps+6%
Internal RAW video
Yes
Yes
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
F-Log / F-Log2
Codecs
H.265, H.264
H.265, H.264
EOS R6 Mark II
X-S20
Weight
680 g
491 g−189 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
127.7 × 85.1 × 65.4 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark II or X-S20?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.0/10 versus 2.5/10 for X-S20 — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X-S20?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and X-S20 is 26.1 MP, so the X-S20 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X-S20 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while x-S20 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the X-S20?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. X-S20 reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X-S20?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and X-S20 weighs 491 g, so the X-S20 is 189 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X-S20 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. X-S20: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and X-S20 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. X-S20: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 750 shots for the X-S20, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and X-S20 at $1,299. The X-S20 is $1,200 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.