Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Nov 2022
Fujifilm
X100
The original fixed-lens premium compact that launched the X100 line and Fujifilm's modern revival.
$1,199
Launch priceReleased Feb 2011
EOS R6 Mark II is 11.8 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
X100
4 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 15 fps)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 425)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
X100
127 × 74 × 54 mm
445 g (0.98 lb / 15.70 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 12mm wider, 24mm taller, and 35mm thicker than X100.
EOS R6 Mark II is 225 g heavier than X100.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 54mm X100
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
X100
127 × 74 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
X100
127 × 54 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
X100
23.6 × 15.8 mm · APS-C
373 mm² area
2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
X100: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better
RAW buffer depth
180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better
AF points / zones
1053 vs 425 — higher is better
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
X100
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 126.5, 74.4, 53.9
AF low-light limit
-7 EV vs -6.5 EV — lower is better
Weight
445 g vs 670 g — lower is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
X100
Pros
- ✓Historic X100 origin
- ✓Hybrid viewfinder debut
- ✓Classic design
- ✓APS-C in compact
Cons
- –12MP very dated
- –Slow AF
- –No 4K
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and X100 at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Fujifilm X100
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark II or X100?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.0/10 versus 2.0/10 for X100 — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X100?
EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and X100 is 12.3 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X100 have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while X100 has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the X100?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. X100 reaches 15 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and X100?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and X100 weighs 445 g, so the X100 is 225 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and X100 record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. X100: 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and X100 weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. X100: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 640 shots for the X100, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and X100 at $1,199. The X100 is $1,300 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs X100 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.