Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs

GoPro

MAX

Dual-lens 360 camera with 5.6K30 spherical video, 16.6MP 360 photos, Max HyperSmooth, front-facing display for vlogging, and in-camera stitching to one microSD card.

$500

Launch price

Released Oct 2019

EOS R6 Mark II is 3.1 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

11categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

1categories

MAX

WildlifeVideo & Hybrid

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·MAX wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has lower AF low-light limit (-6.5 EV vs 0 EV)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 0)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF frame coverage (100 % vs 0 %)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIMAX
Resolution24.2 MP16.6 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst40 fps15 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop6-stop
Weight670 g580 g
Battery760 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

MAX

134 × 91 × 72 mm

580 g (1.28 lb / 20.46 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 4mm wider, 7mm taller, and 16mm thicker than MAX.

EOS R6 Mark II is 90 g heavier than MAX.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 72mm MAX

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

MAX

134 × 91 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

MAX

134 × 72 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

MAX

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

MAX: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIMAX
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good
7.5Good
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Travel
7.5Good
7.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs 0 EV — lower is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 0 — higher is better

  • AF frame coverage

    100 % vs 0 % — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

MAX

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134, 91, 72

  • Codecs

    Adds ProRes

  • Weight

    580 g vs 670 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

MAX

Pros

  • 5.6K30 360 with in-camera stitch
  • Front display for vlogging
  • Max HyperSmooth + Horizon Lock
  • PowerPano 270° stills
  • Three cameras in one (360 / HERO / vlog)

Cons

  • Superseded by MAX2 (no 8K)
  • Single-lens capped at 1440p60
  • Lower resolution than Insta360 X4/X5
  • Discontinued — used market only

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and MAX at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
MAX
Resolution
24.2 MP+46%
16.6 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
17.3 × 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
MAX
Processor
DIGIC X
GP1
EOS R6 Mark II
MAX
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
102,400
EOS R6 Mark II
MAX
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 Mark II or MAX?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 4.0/10 for MAX — 24.2MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and MAX?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and MAX is 16.6 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and MAX have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while MAX has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the MAX?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. MAX reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and MAX?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and MAX weighs 580 g, so the MAX is 90 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and MAX record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. MAX: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and MAX weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. MAX: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 640 shots for the MAX, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and MAX at $500. The MAX is $1,999 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs MAX vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and GoPro press materials.