Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Nov 2022
Nikon
D3300
Popular 24MP entry DX DSLR with no AA filter, EXPEED 4, Full HD 60p, and 700-shot battery in a compact body.
$649
Launch priceReleased Jan 2014
EOS R6 Mark II is 8.8 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
D3300
4 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 11 fps)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
D3300
138 × 98 × 88 mm
520 g (1.15 lb / 18.34 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II and D3300 share virtually identical body dimensions.
EOS R6 Mark II is 150 g heavier than D3300.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 88mm D3300
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
D3300
138 × 98 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
D3300
138 × 88 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
D3300
23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
367 mm² area
2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
Canon RF
105+
native lenses available
D3300
✓ more lensesNikon F
270+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
IBIS effectiveness
8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 11 fps — higher is better
RAW buffer depth
180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better
AF points / zones
1053 vs 493 — higher is better
Reasons to choose
D3300
AF low-light limit
-8.5 EV vs -6.5 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138, 98, 88
Weight
520 g vs 670 g — lower is better
EVF magnification
0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓Resolution — Both 24.2 MP
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓4K max frame rate — Both 60 fps
- ✓EVF refresh rate — Both 120 Hz
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
D3300
Pros
- ✓24.2MP no OLPF sensor
- ✓Full HD 60p video
- ✓Compact lightweight body
- ✓Strong used-market availability
- ✓Guide Mode for beginners
Cons
- –11-point AF
- –No Wi-Fi / Bluetooth
- –Fixed LCD
- –Superseded by D3400/D3500
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and D3300 at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Nikon D3300
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark II or D3300?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for D3300 — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and D3300?
Both cameras share the same 24.2 MP resolution.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and D3300 have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while D3300 does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the D3300?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. D3300 reaches 11 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and D3300?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and D3300 weighs 520 g, so the D3300 is 150 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and D3300 record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. D3300: 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and D3300 weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. D3300: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 640 shots for the D3300, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and D3300 at $649. The D3300 is $1,850 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs D3300 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Nikon press materials.