Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs
Z5 IIC

Nikon

Z5 IIC

Screen-first, viewfinder-free full-frame Z mount body: 24.5MP BSI sensor, EXPEED 7 AF with fish detection, 7.5-stop IBIS, 15 Scene Modes, and N-RAW video.

$1,399

Launch price

Released Oct 2026

Z5 IIC is 3.9 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

9categories

EOS R6 Mark II

★ Sports & Action★ Portrait

Wins

4categories

Z5 IIC

★ Sports & Action★ Portrait

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·Z5 IIC wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 0 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 273)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher EVF resolution (3,690,000 vs 1,040,000)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 350 shots)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Card slots (2 vs 1)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIZ5 IIC
Resolution24.2 MP24.5 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,40064,000
Burst40 fps30 fps
4K60 fps59.94 fps
IBIS8-stop7.5-stop
Weight670 g620 g
Battery760 shots350 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Z5 IIC front view

Z5 IIC

134 × 81 × 72 mm

620 g (1.37 lb / 21.87 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 4mm wider, 18mm taller, and 16mm thicker than Z5 IIC.

EOS R6 Mark II is 50 g heavier than Z5 IIC.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 72mm Z5 IIC

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Z5 IIC back view

Z5 IIC

134 × 81 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Z5 IIC top view

Z5 IIC

134 × 72 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Z5 IIC

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Z5 IIC

Nikon Z

90+

native lenses available

40 first-party50 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIZ5 IIC
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent
9.0Excellent
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
6.0Good
Travel
7.5Good
7.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 0 fps — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 273 — higher is better

  • EVF resolution

    3,690,000 vs 1,040,000 — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    760 shots vs 350 shots — higher is better

  • Card slots

    2 vs 1 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 64,000 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Z5 IIC

  • AF low-light limit

    -10 EV vs -6.5 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 134, 80.7, 72

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Bicycles, Motorcycles, Airplanes…

  • Max video bit rate

    420 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better

  • Weight

    620 g vs 670 g — lower is better

  • Resolution

    24.5 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
  • ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
  • ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
  • ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
  • ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
  • ✓Internal RAW video — Both support internal raw video

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • ✓8-stop IBIS
  • ✓Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • –No CFexpress on base body
  • –Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Z5 IIC

Pros

  • ✓Lightest full-frame Z body (620g)
  • ✓15 Scene Modes — first on a Nikon FX mirrorless
  • ✓EXPEED 7 AF, 10 subject types incl. fish
  • ✓7.5-stop IBIS + Focus Point VR
  • ✓N-RAW internal recording, UVC/UAC webcam

Cons

  • –No built-in EVF — rear screen only
  • –Single SD UHS-II slot
  • –No mechanical shutter
  • –4K 60p is DX (APS-C) crop only

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and Z5 IIC at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

✓ = category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
Z5 IIC
Resolution
24.2 MP
24.5 MP✓+1%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
35.9 x 23.9 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
Z5 IIC
Processor
DIGIC X
EXPEED 7
EOS R6 Mark II
Z5 IIC
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400✓+0.7 stops
64,000
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
204,800
EOS R6 Mark II
Z5 IIC
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical Focal Plane Shutter and Electronic Rolling Shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
—
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/8000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for vlogging, EOS R6 Mark II or Z5 IIC?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.0/10 versus 6.0/10 for Z5 IIC — Fully articulating screen — see yourself while filming.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Z5 IIC?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Z5 IIC is 24.5 MP, so the Z5 IIC captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Z5 IIC have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while Z5 IIC has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Z5 IIC?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Z5 IIC reaches 30 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Z5 IIC?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and Z5 IIC weighs 620 g, so the Z5 IIC is 50 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Z5 IIC record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Z5 IIC: 4K up to 59.94p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Z5 IIC weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Z5 IIC: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 350 shots for the Z5 IIC, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Z5 IIC at $1,399. The Z5 IIC is $1,100 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs Z5 IIC vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Nikon press materials.