Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Nov 2022
Panasonic
Lumix GF10
Ultra-compact selfie-friendly MFT body with 4K and a flip-up screen for creators.
$549
Launch priceReleased Jan 2018
EOS R6 Mark II is 4.8 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
Lumix GF10
3 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 225)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 11 fps)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
Lumix GF10
107 × 65 × 33 mm
270 g (0.60 lb / 9.52 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 32mm wider, 34mm taller, and 55mm thicker than Lumix GF10.
EOS R6 Mark II is 400 g heavier than Lumix GF10.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 33mm Lumix GF10
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Lumix GF10
107 × 65 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Lumix GF10
107 × 33 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
Lumix GF10
17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds
225 mm² area
3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
Canon RF
105+
native lenses available
Lumix GF10
✓ more lensesMicro Four Thirds
130+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
IBIS effectiveness
8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
AF points / zones
1053 vs 225 — higher is better
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 11 fps — higher is better
RAW buffer depth
180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better
Reasons to choose
Lumix GF10
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 106.5, 64.8, 33
Weight
270 g vs 670 g — lower is better
EVF magnification
0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓4K max frame rate — Both 60 fps
- ✓EVF refresh rate — Both 120 Hz
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
- ✓Bluetooth — Both support bluetooth
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
Lumix GF10
Pros
- ✓Very compact
- ✓4K video
- ✓Selfie flip screen
- ✓Affordable MFT
Cons
- –No EVF
- –No IBIS
- –16MP dated
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix GF10 at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Panasonic Lumix GF10
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark II or Lumix GF10?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for Lumix GF10 — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix GF10?
EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Lumix GF10 is 16 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix GF10 have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while Lumix GF10 does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Lumix GF10?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Lumix GF10 reaches 11 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix GF10?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and Lumix GF10 weighs 270 g, so the Lumix GF10 is 400 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix GF10 record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Lumix GF10: 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix GF10 weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Lumix GF10: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 640 shots for the Lumix GF10, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Lumix GF10 at $549. The Lumix GF10 is $1,950 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs Lumix GF10 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Panasonic press materials.