Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Released Nov 2022

vs

Panasonic

Lumix GX9

Compact rangefinder-style Micro Four Thirds camera with 20MP sensor, tilting EVF, IBIS, and 4K video.

$999

Released Feb 2018

EOS R6 Mark II is 4.8 years newer.

Wins

16categories

EOS R6 Mark II

PortraitSports & Action

Wins

1categories

Lumix GX9

1 categories tied

Check current prices

Compare today's discounts, bundled lenses, and refurbished offers at the major authorized retailers for both cameras:

As an affiliate, Cameraegg may earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·Lumix GX9 wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 49)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 30 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 9 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 100 Mbps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IILumix GX9
Resolution24.2 MP20.3 MP
SensorFull FrameMFT
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst40 fps9 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBIS8-stop4-stop
Weight680 g450 g
Battery760 shots260 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

680 g (1.50 lb / 23.99 oz)

Lumix GX9

124 × 72 × 47 mm

450 g (0.99 lb / 15.87 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 14mm wider, 26mm taller, and 42mm thicker than Lumix GX9.

EOS R6 Mark II is 230 g heavier than Lumix GX9.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 47mm Lumix GX9

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Lumix GX9

124 × 72 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Lumix GX9

124 × 47 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lumix GX9

17.3 × 13 mm · Micro Four Thirds

225 mm² area

3.8× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Lumix GX9

✓ more lenses

Micro Four Thirds

130+

native lenses available

60 first-party70 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IILumix GX9
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
1.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
1.0Limited
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 49 — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 30 frames — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 9 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Lumix GX9

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Face, Eye…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 124, 72.1, 46.8

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Codecs

    Adds MP4, AVCHD

  • Weight

    450 g vs 680 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Lumix GX9

Pros

  • Compact rangefinder body
  • 20MP MFT sensor
  • Tilting EVF
  • IBIS

Cons

  • No weather sealing
  • Single card slot
  • Small grip

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix GX9 at major authorized retailers.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix GX9
Resolution
24.2 MP+19%
20.3 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Four Thirds Live MOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
17.3 x 13.0 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix GX9
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Contrast AF with DFD technology
AF points / zones
105321.5× more
49
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
-4 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
Human, Face, Eye, Animal
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix GX9
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps+33%
9 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps4.4× more
9 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
180 frames6× more
30 frames
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix GX9
Max resolution
4K UHD
4K
4K max frame rate
60 fps2× more
30 fps
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps3.4× more
100 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
None
Codecs
H.265, H.264
H.264, MP4, AVCHD
EOS R6 Mark II
Lumix GX9
Weight
680 g
450 g−230 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
124 × 72.1 × 46.8 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or Lumix GX9?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 8.5/10 versus 1.5/10 for Lumix GX9 — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix GX9?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Lumix GX9 is 20.3 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix GX9 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while lumix GX9 has 4-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Lumix GX9?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Lumix GX9 reaches 9 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix GX9?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 680 g and Lumix GX9 weighs 450 g, so the Lumix GX9 is 230 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix GX9 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Lumix GX9: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Lumix GX9 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Lumix GX9: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 260 shots for the Lumix GX9, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Lumix GX9 at $999. The Lumix GX9 is $1,500 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Panasonic press materials.