Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs

Pentax

K-50

Weather-sealed entry APS-C DSLR with IBIS and AA filter simulator at an accessible price.

$599

Launch price

Released Jun 2013

EOS R6 Mark II is 9.4 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

12categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

2categories

K-50

TravelVlogging

4 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·K-50 wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 101)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 11 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 3 stops)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIK-50
Resolution24.2 MP16.3 MP
SensorFull FrameAPS-C
ISO max102,40025,600
Burst40 fps11 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop3-stop
Weight670 g590 g
Battery760 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

K-50

129 × 97 × 70 mm

590 g (1.30 lb / 20.81 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 9mm wider, 2mm taller, and 18mm thicker than K-50.

EOS R6 Mark II is 80 g heavier than K-50.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 70mm K-50

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

K-50

129 × 97 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

K-50

129 × 70 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

K-50

23.7 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

372 mm² area

2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

K-50

Pentax K

70+

native lenses available

30 first-party40 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIK-50
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
5.5Fair
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
7.5Good
7.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good
6.5Good
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
7.0Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 101 — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 11 fps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 3 stops — higher is better

Reasons to choose

K-50

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Animal, Bird…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 129, 96.5, 70

  • Weight

    590 g vs 670 g — lower is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

K-50

Pros

  • Weather sealed entry
  • IBIS
  • AA filter simulator
  • Great used value

Cons

  • 16MP sensor
  • DSLR platform
  • Limited video

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and K-50 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
K-50
Resolution
24.2 MP+48%
16.3 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
23.7 × 15.7 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
K-50
Processor
DIGIC X
Image processor
EOS R6 Mark II
K-50
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400+2 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
102,400
EOS R6 Mark II
K-50
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or K-50?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 9.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for K-50 — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and K-50?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and K-50 is 16.3 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and K-50 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while K-50 has 3-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the K-50?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. K-50 reaches 11 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and K-50?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and K-50 weighs 590 g, so the K-50 is 80 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and K-50 record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. K-50: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and K-50 weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. K-50: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 640 shots for the K-50, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and K-50 at $599. The K-50 is $1,900 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs K-50 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Pentax press materials.