Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
EOS R6 Mark II

Canon

EOS R6 Mark II

Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released Nov 2022

vs

Sony

Alpha 7S II

12MP low-light video pioneer before the A7S III revolution.

$2,999

Launch price

Released Sep 2015

EOS R6 Mark II is 7.2 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

13categories

EOS R6 Mark II

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

2categories

Alpha 7S II

PortraitTravel

3 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark II wins 5 categories·Alpha 7S II wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 5 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 169)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (760 shots vs 310 shots)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (mechanical) (12 fps vs 5 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark II has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 30 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIAlpha 7S II
Resolution24.2 MP12.2 MP
SensorFull FrameFull Frame
ISO max102,400102,400
Burst40 fps5 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBIS8-stop4.5-stop
Weight670 g627 g
Battery760 shots310 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II front view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 × 88 mm

670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Alpha 7S II

127 × 96 × 60 mm

627 g (1.38 lb / 22.12 oz)

EOS R6 Mark II is 12mm wider, 3mm taller, and 28mm thicker than Alpha 7S II.

EOS R6 Mark II is 43 g heavier than Alpha 7S II.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 60mm Alpha 7S II

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark II back view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 98 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7S II

127 × 96 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark II top view

EOS R6 Mark II

138 × 88 mm

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

Alpha 7S II

127 × 60 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark II

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Alpha 7S II

35.6 × 23.8 mm · Full Frame

847 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark II

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Alpha 7S II

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIAlpha 7S II
Portrait
8.5Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Sports & Action
9.0Excellent✓ wins
1.5Limited
Video & Hybrid
7.5Good✓ wins
5.0Fair
Landscape
7.0Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Travel
7.5Good✓ wins
6.5Good
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Vlogging
8.0Excellent✓ wins
6.0Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark II

  • AF low-light limit

    -6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-II, SD UHS-II

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 5 fps — higher is better

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 169 — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    760 shots vs 310 shots — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    12 fps vs 5 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Alpha 7S II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 126.9, 95.7, 60.3

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC S, AVCHD, MP4

  • Weight

    627 g vs 670 g — lower is better

  • EVF magnification

    0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 102,400
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark II

Pros

  • Up to 40fps electronic burst
  • 4K 60p oversampled from 6K
  • Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
  • 8-stop IBIS
  • Fully articulating touchscreen

Cons

  • 24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
  • No CFexpress on base body
  • Short battery life vs. A7 IV

Alpha 7S II

Pros

  • Legendary low light
  • 4K internal
  • Compact files

Cons

  • 12MP stills limit
  • Old AF
  • 8-bit 4K

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7S II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 7S II
Resolution
24.2 MP+98%
12.2 MP
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
Full Frame Exmor CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
35.6 × 23.8 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 7S II
Processor
DIGIC X
BIONZ X
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 7S II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
102,400
102,400
ISO max (expanded)
204,800
409,600
EOS R6 Mark II
Alpha 7S II
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R6 Mark II or Alpha 7S II?

EOS R6 Mark II scores 9.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for Alpha 7S II — 40fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7S II?

EOS R6 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Alpha 7S II is 12.2 MP, so the EOS R6 Mark II captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7S II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while Alpha 7S II has 4.5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the Alpha 7S II?

EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Alpha 7S II reaches 5 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7S II?

EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and Alpha 7S II weighs 627 g, so the Alpha 7S II is 43 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7S II record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. Alpha 7S II: 4K up to 30p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark II and Alpha 7S II weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. Alpha 7S II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 310 shots for the Alpha 7S II, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and Alpha 7S II at $2,999. The EOS R6 Mark II is $500 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs Alpha 7S II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.