Canon
EOS R6 Mark II
Versatile 24.2MP full-frame hybrid with class-leading AF and 4K 60p video.
$2,499
Launch priceReleased Nov 2022
Sony
ZV-E10
Creator-first APS-C vlog body with product showcase, directional mic, and interchangeable E-mount lenses.
$699
Launch priceReleased Jul 2021
EOS R6 Mark II is 1.3 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark II
Wins
ZV-E10
4 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher ISO max (native) (102,400 vs 25,600)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 11 fps)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher RAW buffer depth (180 frames vs 60 frames)
- AEOS R6 Mark II has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 × 88 mm
670 g (1.48 lb / 23.63 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
ZV-E10
115 × 64 × 45 mm
343 g (0.76 lb / 12.10 oz)
EOS R6 Mark II is 23mm wider, 34mm taller, and 44mm thicker than ZV-E10.
EOS R6 Mark II is 327 g heavier than ZV-E10.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark II · 45mm ZV-E10
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
ZV-E10
115 × 64 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark II
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
ZV-E10
115 × 45 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark II
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
ZV-E10
23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
367 mm² area
2.3× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark II
Canon RF
105+
native lenses available
ZV-E10
✓ more lensesSony E
350+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark II
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV vs -4 EV — lower is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
IBIS effectiveness
8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
ISO max (native)
102,400 vs 25,600 — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 11 fps — higher is better
RAW buffer depth
180 frames vs 60 frames — higher is better
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
ZV-E10
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 115.2, 64.2, 44.8
Weight
343 g vs 670 g — lower is better
EVF magnification
0.78 × vs 0.76 × — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓Resolution — Both 24.2 MP
- ✓AA filter — Both support aa filter
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓4K max frame rate — Both 60 fps
- ✓EVF refresh rate — Both 120 Hz
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Up to 40fps electronic burst
- ✓4K 60p oversampled from 6K
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF II — superb subject tracking
- ✓8-stop IBIS
- ✓Fully articulating touchscreen
Cons
- –24.2MP may feel limiting for large prints
- –No CFexpress on base body
- –Short battery life vs. A7 IV
ZV-E10
Pros
- ✓Built for vlogging
- ✓Interchangeable lenses
- ✓Product Showcase mode
- ✓Affordable
Cons
- –No IBIS
- –No EVF
- –No mechanical shutter
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark II and ZV-E10 at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark II
Sony ZV-E10
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for landscape, EOS R6 Mark II or ZV-E10?
EOS R6 Mark II scores 7.0/10 versus 1.5/10 for ZV-E10 — Full-frame sensor — wider dynamic range.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and ZV-E10?
Both cameras share the same 24.2 MP resolution.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and ZV-E10 have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark II has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while ZV-E10 does not have IBIS.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark II or the ZV-E10?
EOS R6 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. ZV-E10 reaches 11 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark II and ZV-E10?
EOS R6 Mark II weighs 670 g and ZV-E10 weighs 343 g, so the ZV-E10 is 327 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark II and ZV-E10 record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark II: 4K up to 60p. ZV-E10: 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark II and ZV-E10 weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark II: Yes. ZV-E10: No.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 760 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark II and 640 shots for the ZV-E10, giving the EOS R6 Mark II the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark II launched at $2,499 and ZV-E10 at $699. The ZV-E10 is $1,800 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark II vs ZV-E10 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Sony press materials.