Canon
EOS R6 Mark III
Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.
$2,799
Launch priceReleased Nov 2025
DJI
Osmo Nano
Ultra-compact modular action camera with 1/1.3-inch sensor, 35MP stills, 4K 60p video, 4K 120fps slow motion, and a Multifunctional Vision Dock.
$299
Launch priceReleased Sep 2025
EOS R6 Mark III is 2 months newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R6 Mark III
Wins
Osmo Nano
1 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 0)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)
- BOsmo Nano has lower Weight (124 g vs 699 g)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 15 fps)
- AEOS R6 Mark III has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 25,600)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 × 88 mm
699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
Osmo Nano
59 × 72 × 28 mm
124 g (0.27 lb / 4.37 oz)
EOS R6 Mark III is 79mm wider, 27mm taller, and 60mm thicker than Osmo Nano.
EOS R6 Mark III is 575 g heavier than Osmo Nano.
Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 28mm Osmo Nano
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 98 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Osmo Nano
59 × 72 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R6 Mark III
138 × 88 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Osmo Nano
59 × 28 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R6 Mark III
35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame
858 mm² area
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R6 Mark III
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
Osmo Nano: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R6 Mark III
AF points / zones
1053 vs 0 — higher is better
Subject recognition
Adds People, Dogs, Cats…
Codecs
Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better
ISO max (native)
64,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better
Reasons to choose
Osmo Nano
Codecs
Adds HEVC
Stabilization modes
Adds RockSteady 3.0, HorizonBalancing
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 59.1, 71.7, 28
Card types
Adds microSD
Weight
124 g vs 699 g — lower is better
1080p max frame rate
240 fps vs 180 fps — higher is better
Resolution
35 MP vs 32.5 MP — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
- ✓Bluetooth — Both support bluetooth
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R6 Mark III
Pros
- ✓32.5MP full-frame sensor
- ✓7K RAW video & 4K 120p
- ✓40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
- ✓8.5-stop IBIS
Cons
- –Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
- –Smaller LCD than R5 II
- –LP-E6P required for full features
Osmo Nano
Pros
- ✓52g camera body
- ✓1/1.3-inch sensor
- ✓4K 120fps slow motion
- ✓10m waterproof camera body
Cons
- –Dock is only IPX4
- –Fixed ultra-wide lens
- –Smaller battery in camera body
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R6 Mark III and Osmo Nano at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R6 Mark III
DJI Osmo Nano
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 Mark III or Osmo Nano?
EOS R6 Mark III scores 8.0/10 versus 2.5/10 for Osmo Nano — 32.5MP — ample resolution for portraits.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and Osmo Nano?
EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and Osmo Nano is 35 MP, so the Osmo Nano captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R6 Mark III and Osmo Nano have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Osmo Nano uses Electronic image stabilization (electronic).
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the Osmo Nano?
EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. Osmo Nano reaches 15 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and Osmo Nano?
EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and Osmo Nano weighs 124 g, so the Osmo Nano is 575 g lighter.
Do the EOS R6 Mark III and Osmo Nano record 4K video?
EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. Osmo Nano: 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R6 Mark III and Osmo Nano weather sealed?
EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. Osmo Nano: Yes.
How much does each cost?
EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and Osmo Nano at $299. The Osmo Nano is $2,500 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R6 Mark III vs Osmo Nano vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and DJI press materials.