Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare
EOS R6 Mark III

Canon

EOS R6 Mark III

Hybrid 32.5MP full-frame RF body with 7K RAW video, 40fps electronic burst, 8.5-stop IBIS, and Dual Pixel CMOS AF II.

$2,799

Released Nov 2025

vs

DJI

Osmo Nano

Ultra-compact modular action camera with 1/1.3-inch sensor, 35MP stills, 4K 60p video, 4K 120fps slow motion, and a Multifunctional Vision Dock.

$299

Released Sep 2025

EOS R6 Mark III is 2 months newer.

Wins

9categories

EOS R6 Mark III

Sports & ActionPortrait

Wins

2categories

Osmo Nano

Travel

2 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R6 Mark III wins 4 categories·Osmo Nano wins 1 categories
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 0)
  • BOsmo Nano has lower Weight (52 g vs 699 g)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Max video bit rate (2600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AEOS R6 Mark III has higher ISO max (native) (64,000 vs 25,600)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R6 Mark IIIOsmo Nano
Resolution32.5 MP35 MP
SensorFull Frame1/1.3 inch
ISO max64,00025,600
Burst40 fps15 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS8.5-stopNo
Weight699 g52 g
Battery640 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III front view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 × 88 mm

699 g (1.54 lb / 24.66 oz)

Osmo Nano

57 × 30 × 28 mm

52 g (0.11 lb / 1.83 oz)

EOS R6 Mark III is 81mm wider, 69mm taller, and 60mm thicker than Osmo Nano.

EOS R6 Mark III is 647 g heavier than Osmo Nano.

Depth (front-to-back): 88mm EOS R6 Mark III · 28mm Osmo Nano

Back view, to scale

Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.

EOS R6 Mark III back view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 98 mm

Osmo Nano

57 × 30 mm

Top view, to scale

Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.

EOS R6 Mark III top view

EOS R6 Mark III

138 × 88 mm

Osmo Nano

57 × 28 mm

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R6 Mark III

35.9 × 23.9 mm · Full Frame

858 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R6 Mark III

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Osmo Nano: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R6 Mark IIIOsmo Nano
Portrait
8.0Excellent✓ wins
2.5Limited
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
5.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
4.0Fair
Landscape
7.5Good✓ wins
3.5Limited
Travel
7.5Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Wildlife
6.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R6 Mark III

  • AF points / zones

    1053 vs 0 — higher is better

  • Subject recognition

    Adds People, Dogs, Cats…

  • Codecs

    Adds CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S…

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 138.4, 98.4, 88.4

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II

  • Max video bit rate

    2600 Mbps vs 200 Mbps — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • ISO max (native)

    64,000 vs 25,600 — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Osmo Nano

  • Codecs

    Adds HEVC

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 57.3, 29.5, 28

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • Weight

    52 g vs 699 g — lower is better

  • Resolution

    35 MP vs 32.5 MP — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing
  • Battery life (CIPA)Both 640 shots
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R6 Mark III

Pros

  • 32.5MP full-frame sensor
  • 7K RAW video & 4K 120p
  • 40fps electronic burst with Pre-Continuous
  • 8.5-stop IBIS

Cons

  • Single CFexpress Type B + SD slot
  • Smaller LCD than R5 II
  • LP-E6P required for full features

Osmo Nano

Pros

  • 52g camera body
  • 1/1.3-inch sensor
  • 4K 120fps slow motion
  • 10m waterproof camera body

Cons

  • Dock is only IPX4
  • Fixed ultra-wide lens
  • Smaller battery in camera body

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R6 Mark III
Osmo Nano
Resolution
32.5 MP
35 MP+8%
Sensor type
Full Frame CMOS
1/1.3-inch CMOS
Sensor size
35.9 × 23.9 mm
1/1.3 inch
AA filter
Yes
EOS R6 Mark III
Osmo Nano
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Fixed focus
AF points / zones
1053
0
AF frame coverage
100 %
AF low-light limit
-6.5 EV
Eye AF
Yes
No
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
People, Dogs, Cats, Birds, Horses, Cars, Motorbikes, Aircraft, Trains
EOS R6 Mark III
Osmo Nano
Burst (mechanical)
12 fps2× more
6 fps
Burst (electronic)
40 fps2.7× more
15 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
Yes
RAW buffer depth
150 frames2.5× more
60 frames
EOS R6 Mark III
Osmo Nano
Max resolution
7K RAW
4K
4K max frame rate
120 fps2× more
60 fps
Max video bit rate
2600 Mbps13× more
200 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
Canon Log 2 / Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ / HLG
Standard profiles
Codecs
CRM, XF-HEVC S, XF-AVC S, H.265, H.264
HEVC
EOS R6 Mark III
Osmo Nano
Weight
699 g
52 g−647 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
138.4 × 98.4 × 88.4 mm
57.3 × 29.5 × 28 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, EOS R6 Mark III or Osmo Nano?

EOS R6 Mark III scores 8.0/10 versus 2.5/10 for Osmo Nano — 32.5MP — ample resolution for portraits.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and Osmo Nano?

EOS R6 Mark III is 32.5 MP and Osmo Nano is 35 MP, so the Osmo Nano captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and Osmo Nano have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R6 Mark III has 8.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while osmo Nano does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R6 Mark III or the Osmo Nano?

EOS R6 Mark III reaches 40 fps electronic. Osmo Nano reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R6 Mark III and Osmo Nano?

EOS R6 Mark III weighs 699 g and Osmo Nano weighs 52 g, so the Osmo Nano is 647 g lighter.

Do the EOS R6 Mark III and Osmo Nano record 4K video?

EOS R6 Mark III: 4K up to 120p. Osmo Nano: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R6 Mark III and Osmo Nano weather sealed?

EOS R6 Mark III: Yes. Osmo Nano: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 640 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R6 Mark III and 640 shots for the Osmo Nano, giving the Osmo Nano the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R6 Mark III launched at $2,799 and Osmo Nano at $299. The Osmo Nano is $2,500 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.

Product images courtesy of Canon and DJI press materials.