Canon
EOS R7
32.5MP APS-C RF-mount body with 30fps burst, 4K 60p, 7-stop IBIS, and advanced subject tracking.
$1,499
Launch priceReleased May 2022
Fujifilm
X-H2
40MP APS-C hybrid with 8K video and pro stills resolution.
$1,999
Launch priceReleased Sep 2022
X-H2 is 4 months newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R7
Wins
X-H2
4 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BX-H2 has higher RAW buffer depth (202 frames vs 42 frames)
- AEOS R7 has higher ISO max (native) (32,000 vs 12,800)
- BX-H2 has higher EVF resolution (5,760,000 vs 2,360,000)
- BX-H2 has higher Max video bit rate (720 Mbps vs 340 Mbps)
- AEOS R7 has higher AF points / zones (651 vs 425)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R7
132 × 90 × 92 mm
612 g (1.35 lb / 21.59 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
X-H2
136 × 93 × 85 mm
660 g (1.46 lb / 23.28 oz)
EOS R7 is 4mm narrower and 3mm shorter than X-H2 but it is also 7mm thicker.
EOS R7 is 48 g lighter than X-H2.
Depth (front-to-back): 92mm EOS R7 · 85mm X-H2
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R7
132 × 90 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
X-H2
136 × 93 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R7
132 × 92 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
X-H2
136 × 85 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R7
22.3 × 14.8 mm · APS-C
330 mm² area
X-H2
23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C
367 mm² area
1.1× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R7
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
X-H2
✓ more lensesFujifilm X
105+
native lenses available
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R7
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 132, 90.4, 91.7
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
Codecs
Adds AAC, LPCM
ISO max (native)
32,000 vs 12,800 — higher is better
AA filter
Only EOS R7 supports it
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Vehicle
AF points / zones
651 vs 425 — higher is better
Burst (electronic)
30 fps vs 20 fps — higher is better
Reasons to choose
X-H2
AF low-light limit
-7 EV vs -5 EV — lower is better
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 136.3, 92.9, 84.6
Card types
Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II, SDXC V90
Codecs
Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT…
RAW buffer depth
202 frames vs 42 frames — higher is better
Subject recognition
Adds Automobile, Motorcycle/Bike, Airplane…
EVF resolution
5,760,000 vs 2,360,000 — higher is better
Max video bit rate
720 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓AF frame coverage — Both 100 %
- ✓Eye AF — Both support eye af
- ✓Animal / bird AF — Both support animal / bird af
- ✓Burst (mechanical) — Both 15 fps
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
- ✓In-body stabilization (IBIS) — Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R7
Pros
- ✓High-resolution 32.5MP APS-C sensor
- ✓Up to 30fps electronic burst
- ✓7-stop in-body stabilization
- ✓Dual SD UHS-II card slots
- ✓Strong value for wildlife and sports reach
Cons
- –APS-C sensor trails full-frame in low-light depth
- –RF-S lens lineup is still limited
- –4K 60p uses a crop in some modes
X-H2
Pros
- ✓40MP APS-C
- ✓8K video
- ✓IBIS
Cons
- –APS-C
- –Large files
- –Complex video modes
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R7 and X-H2 at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R7
Fujifilm X-H2
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for video, EOS R7 or X-H2?
X-H2 scores 9.0/10 versus 3.5/10 for EOS R7 — 8K recording for future-proof footage.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R7 and X-H2?
EOS R7 is 32.5 MP and X-H2 is 40.2 MP, so the X-H2 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R7 and X-H2 have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R7 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while X-H2 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization.
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R7 or the X-H2?
EOS R7 reaches 30 fps electronic. X-H2 reaches 20 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R7 and X-H2?
EOS R7 weighs 612 g and X-H2 weighs 660 g, so the EOS R7 is 48 g lighter.
Do the EOS R7 and X-H2 record 4K video?
EOS R7: 4K up to 59.94p. X-H2: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R7 and X-H2 weather sealed?
EOS R7: Yes. X-H2: Yes.
Which has better battery life?
Rated battery life is 660 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R7 and 540 shots for the X-H2, giving the EOS R7 the edge.
How much does each cost?
EOS R7 launched at $1,499 and X-H2 at $1,999. The EOS R7 is $500 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R7 vs X-H2 vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed October 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and Fujifilm press materials.