Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Canon

EOS R7

32.5MP APS-C RF-mount body with 30fps burst, 4K 60p, 7-stop IBIS, and advanced subject tracking.

$1,499

Launch price

Released May 2022

vs

Pentax

K-3 II

24MP APS-C DSLR with pixel shift resolution, GPS, and no AA filter for detail-focused work.

$1,099

Launch price

Released Apr 2015

EOS R7 is 7.1 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

11categories

EOS R7

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

1categories

K-3 II

WildlifeTravel

6 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R7 wins 5 categories·K-3 II wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R7 has higher AF points / zones (651 vs 101)
  • AEOS R7 has higher Burst (mechanical) (15 fps vs 6 fps)
  • AEOS R7 has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AEOS R7 has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AEOS R7 has higher EVF magnification (1.15 × vs 0.78 ×)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R7K-3 II
Resolution32.5 MP24.4 MP
Sensor22.3 × 14.8 mmAPS-C
ISO max32,00025,600
Burst30 fps15 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop6-stop
Weight612 g700 g
Battery660 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R7

132 × 90 × 92 mm

612 g (1.35 lb / 21.59 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

K-3 II

132 × 102 × 78 mm

700 g (1.54 lb / 24.69 oz)

EOS R7 is 11mm shorter than K-3 II but it is also 1mm wider and 14mm thicker.

EOS R7 is 88 g lighter than K-3 II.

Depth (front-to-back): 92mm EOS R7 · 78mm K-3 II

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R7

22.3 × 14.8 mm · APS-C

330 mm² area

K-3 II

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

1.1× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R7

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

K-3 II

Pentax K

70+

native lenses available

30 first-party40 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R7K-3 II
Portrait
5.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
6.0Good
Landscape
5.5Fair✓ wins
5.0Fair
Travel
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Wildlife
9.0Excellent
9.0Excellent
Vlogging
7.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R7

  • AF low-light limit

    -5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132, 90.4, 91.7

  • AF points / zones

    651 vs 101 — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    15 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R7 supports it

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

  • EVF magnification

    1.15 × vs 0.78 × — higher is better

Reasons to choose

K-3 II

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 131.5, 101.5, 77.5

  • RAW buffer depth

    60 frames vs 42 frames — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • Pre-Capture / Pre-ReleaseBoth support pre-capture / pre-release
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R7

Pros

  • High-resolution 32.5MP APS-C sensor
  • Up to 30fps electronic burst
  • 7-stop in-body stabilization
  • Dual SD UHS-II card slots
  • Strong value for wildlife and sports reach

Cons

  • APS-C sensor trails full-frame in low-light depth
  • RF-S lens lineup is still limited
  • 4K 60p uses a crop in some modes

K-3 II

Pros

  • Pixel shift hi-res
  • No AA filter
  • GPS built-in
  • Weather sealed

Cons

  • Superseded by K-3 III
  • DSLR
  • Limited video

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R7 and K-3 II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R7
K-3 II
Resolution
32.5 MP+33%
24.4 MP
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
22.3 × 14.8 mm
23.5 × 15.6 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R7
K-3 II
Processor
DIGIC X
Image processor
EOS R7
K-3 II
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
32,000+0.3 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
51,200
102,400
EOS R7
K-3 II
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R7 or K-3 II?

EOS R7 scores 10.0/10 versus 6.5/10 for K-3 II — 30fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R7 and K-3 II?

EOS R7 is 32.5 MP and K-3 II is 24.4 MP, so the EOS R7 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R7 and K-3 II have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R7 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while K-3 II has 6-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R7 or the K-3 II?

EOS R7 reaches 30 fps electronic. K-3 II reaches 15 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R7 and K-3 II?

EOS R7 weighs 612 g and K-3 II weighs 700 g, so the EOS R7 is 88 g lighter.

Do the EOS R7 and K-3 II record 4K video?

EOS R7: 4K up to 60p. K-3 II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R7 and K-3 II weather sealed?

EOS R7: Yes. K-3 II: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 660 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R7 and 640 shots for the K-3 II, giving the EOS R7 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R7 launched at $1,499 and K-3 II at $1,099. The K-3 II is $400 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R7 vs K-3 II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.