Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Canon

EOS R7

32.5MP APS-C RF-mount body with 30fps burst, 4K 60p, 7-stop IBIS, and advanced subject tracking.

$1,499

Launch price

Released May 2022

vs

Pentax

K-50

Weather-sealed entry APS-C DSLR with IBIS and AA filter simulator at an accessible price.

$599

Launch price

Released Jun 2013

EOS R7 is 8.9 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

11categories

EOS R7

Sports & ActionWildlife

Wins

2categories

K-50

TravelVlogging

5 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R7 wins 5 categories·K-50 wins 0 categories
  • AEOS R7 has higher AF points / zones (651 vs 101)
  • AEOS R7 has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 11 fps)
  • AEOS R7 has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 3 stops)
  • AEOS R7 has higher Burst (mechanical) (15 fps vs 6 fps)
  • AEOS R7 has higher Max video bit rate (340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R7K-50
Resolution32.5 MP16.3 MP
Sensor22.3 × 14.8 mmAPS-C
ISO max32,00025,600
Burst30 fps11 fps
4K60 fps60 fps
IBIS8-stop3-stop
Weight612 g590 g
Battery660 shots640 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R7

132 × 90 × 92 mm

612 g (1.35 lb / 21.59 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

K-50

129 × 97 × 70 mm

590 g (1.30 lb / 20.81 oz)

EOS R7 is 6mm shorter than K-50 but it is also 3mm wider and 22mm thicker.

EOS R7 is 22 g heavier than K-50.

Depth (front-to-back): 92mm EOS R7 · 70mm K-50

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R7

22.3 × 14.8 mm · APS-C

330 mm² area

K-50

23.7 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

372 mm² area

1.1× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R7

✓ more lenses

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

K-50

Pentax K

70+

native lenses available

30 first-party40 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R7K-50
Portrait
5.5Fair
5.5Fair
Sports & Action
10.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Landscape
5.5Fair✓ wins
2.5Limited
Travel
8.5Excellent✓ wins
7.5Good
Wildlife
9.0Excellent✓ wins
6.5Good
Vlogging
7.0Good
7.0Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R7

  • AF low-light limit

    -5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132, 90.4, 91.7

  • AF points / zones

    651 vs 101 — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 11 fps — higher is better

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 3 stops — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    15 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    340 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only EOS R7 supports it

Reasons to choose

K-50

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 129, 96.5, 70

  • RAW buffer depth

    60 frames vs 42 frames — higher is better

  • Weight

    590 g vs 612 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • AA filterBoth support aa filter
  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • 4K max frame rateBoth 60 fps
  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)Both support in-body stabilization (ibis)

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R7

Pros

  • High-resolution 32.5MP APS-C sensor
  • Up to 30fps electronic burst
  • 7-stop in-body stabilization
  • Dual SD UHS-II card slots
  • Strong value for wildlife and sports reach

Cons

  • APS-C sensor trails full-frame in low-light depth
  • RF-S lens lineup is still limited
  • 4K 60p uses a crop in some modes

K-50

Pros

  • Weather sealed entry
  • IBIS
  • AA filter simulator
  • Great used value

Cons

  • 16MP sensor
  • DSLR platform
  • Limited video

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the EOS R7 and K-50 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R7
K-50
Resolution
32.5 MP+99%
16.3 MP
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
22.3 × 14.8 mm
23.7 × 15.7 mm
AA filter
Yes
Yes
EOS R7
K-50
Processor
DIGIC X
Image processor
EOS R7
K-50
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
32,000+0.3 stops
25,600
ISO max (expanded)
51,200
102,400
EOS R7
K-50
Shutter type
Mechanical + Electronic
Mechanical + Electronic
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/8000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, EOS R7 or K-50?

EOS R7 scores 10.0/10 versus 4.0/10 for K-50 — 30fps burst — pro-level action capture.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R7 and K-50?

EOS R7 is 32.5 MP and K-50 is 16.3 MP, so the EOS R7 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R7 and K-50 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R7 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while K-50 has 3-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R7 or the K-50?

EOS R7 reaches 30 fps electronic. K-50 reaches 11 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R7 and K-50?

EOS R7 weighs 612 g and K-50 weighs 590 g, so the K-50 is 22 g lighter.

Do the EOS R7 and K-50 record 4K video?

EOS R7: 4K up to 60p. K-50: 4K up to 60p.

Are the EOS R7 and K-50 weather sealed?

EOS R7: Yes. K-50: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 660 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R7 and 640 shots for the K-50, giving the EOS R7 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R7 launched at $1,499 and K-50 at $599. The K-50 is $900 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R7 vs K-50 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.