Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Canon

EOS R7

32.5MP APS-C RF-mount body with 30fps burst, 4K 60p, 7-stop IBIS, and advanced subject tracking.

$1,499

Released May 2022

vs

Sony

FX30

Super 35 cinema camera with 4K 120p and affordable entry to Sony Cinema Line.

$1,799

Released Sep 2022

FX30 is 4 months newer.

Wins

9categories

EOS R7

WildlifeTravel

Wins

3categories

FX30

Video & HybridTravel

3 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

EOS R7 wins 3 categories·FX30 wins 2 categories
  • AEOS R7 has higher Burst (electronic) (30 fps vs 10 fps)
  • BFX30 has higher 4K max frame rate (120 fps vs 60 fps)
  • BFX30 has higher Max video bit rate (600 Mbps vs 340 Mbps)
  • AEOS R7 has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 5 stops)
  • AEOS R7 has higher Burst (mechanical) (15 fps vs 10 fps)

Key specs at a glance

EOS R7FX30
Resolution32.5 MP26 MP
Sensor22.3 × 14.8 mmAPS-C
ISO max32,00032,000
Burst30 fps10 fps
4K60 fps120 fps
IBIS8-stop5-stop
Weight612 g646 g
Battery660 shots570 shots

Size and weight, to scale

EOS R7

132 × 90 × 92 mm

612 g (1.35 lb / 21.59 oz)

FX30

130 × 78 × 85 mm

646 g (1.42 lb / 22.79 oz)

EOS R7 is 2mm wider, 13mm taller, and 7mm thicker than FX30.

EOS R7 is 34 g lighter than FX30.

Depth (front-to-back): 92mm EOS R7 · 85mm FX30

Sensor size, to scale

EOS R7

22.3 × 14.8 mm · APS-C

330 mm² area

FX30

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

1.1× larger sensor area = shallower depth of field and better low-light performance.

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

EOS R7

Canon RF

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

FX30

✓ more lenses

Sony E

350+

native lenses available

80 first-party270 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseEOS R7FX30
Portrait
5.5Fair
6.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
8.0Excellent✓ wins
4.0Fair
Video & Hybrid
6.0Good
8.0Excellent✓ wins
Landscape
5.5Fair✓ wins
5.0Fair
Travel
8.5Excellent✓ wins
8.0Excellent
Wildlife
9.0Excellent✓ wins
4.5Fair
Vlogging
7.0Good
7.0Good

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

EOS R7

  • AF low-light limit

    -5 EV vs -3 EV — lower is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 132, 90.4, 91.7

  • Burst (electronic)

    30 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

  • AA filter

    Only EOS R7 supports it

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Bird, Vehicle

  • Pre-Capture / Pre-Release

    Only EOS R7 supports it

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 5 stops — higher is better

  • Burst (mechanical)

    15 fps vs 10 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

FX30

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 129.7, 77.8, 84.5

  • Codecs

    Adds XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I

  • 4K max frame rate

    120 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • Internal RAW video

    Only FX30 supports it

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type A

  • Max video bit rate

    600 Mbps vs 340 Mbps — higher is better

  • RAW buffer depth

    60 frames vs 42 frames — higher is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • ISO max (native)Both 32,000
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • Animal / bird AFBoth support animal / bird af
  • In-body stabilizationBoth support in-body stabilization
  • Weather sealingBoth support weather sealing

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

EOS R7

Pros

  • High-resolution 32.5MP APS-C sensor
  • Up to 30fps electronic burst
  • 7-stop in-body stabilization
  • Dual SD UHS-II card slots
  • Strong value for wildlife and sports reach

Cons

  • APS-C sensor trails full-frame in low-light depth
  • RF-S lens lineup is still limited
  • 4K 60p uses a crop in some modes

FX30

Pros

  • 4K 120p
  • Affordable cinema
  • Active cooling
  • Log profiles

Cons

  • Super 35 crop
  • 26MP stills crop
  • No full-frame

Full specifications

= category winner

EOS R7
FX30
Resolution
32.5 MP+25%
26 MP
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
APS-C Exmor R CMOS
Sensor size
22.3 × 14.8 mm
23.3 × 15.5 mm
AA filter
Yes
No
EOS R7
FX30
AF system
Dual Pixel CMOS AF II
Fast Hybrid AF (phase-detection / contrast-detection)
AF points / zones
651+32%
495
AF frame coverage
100 %+6%
94 %
AF low-light limit
-5 EV
-3 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
Yes
Subject recognition
Human, Animal, Bird, Vehicle
Human, Animal
EOS R7
FX30
Burst (mechanical)
15 fps+50%
10 fps
Burst (electronic)
30 fps3× more
10 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
42 frames
60 frames+43%
EOS R7
FX30
Max resolution
4K UHD
4K UHD / DCI 4K
4K max frame rate
60 fps
120 fps2× more
Max video bit rate
340 Mbps
600 Mbps+76%
Internal RAW video
No
Yes
Log profile
Canon Log 3 / HDR PQ
S-Log3 / HLG / S-Cinetone
Codecs
H.265, H.264
XAVC HS, XAVC S, XAVC S-I, H.265, H.264
EOS R7
FX30
Weight
612 g−34 g less
646 g
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
132 × 90.4 × 91.7 mm
129.7 × 77.8 × 84.5 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
Yes

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, EOS R7 or FX30?

EOS R7 scores 9.0/10 versus 4.5/10 for FX30 — 30fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the EOS R7 and FX30?

EOS R7 is 32.5 MP and FX30 is 26 MP, so the EOS R7 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the EOS R7 and FX30 have in-body image stabilization?

EOS R7 has 8-stop in-body image stabilization, while fX30 has 5-stop in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R7 or the FX30?

EOS R7 reaches 30 fps electronic. FX30 reaches 10 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the EOS R7 and FX30?

EOS R7 weighs 612 g and FX30 weighs 646 g, so the EOS R7 is 34 g lighter.

Do the EOS R7 and FX30 record 4K video?

EOS R7: 4K up to 60p. FX30: 4K up to 120p.

Are the EOS R7 and FX30 weather sealed?

EOS R7: Yes. FX30: Yes.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 660 shots (CIPA) for the EOS R7 and 570 shots for the FX30, giving the EOS R7 the edge.

How much does each cost?

EOS R7 launched at $1,499 and FX30 at $1,799. The EOS R7 is $300 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.