Canon
EOS R8 Mark II
Compact 24.2MP full-frame RF body with 5-axis IBIS (up to 7.5-stop Coordinated Control IS), Dual Pixel CMOS AF II, 40fps electronic bursts, and 6K-oversampled 4K 60p.
$1,899
Launch priceReleased Sep 2026
DJI
Osmo Nano
Ultra-compact modular action camera with 1/1.3-inch sensor, 35MP stills, 4K 60p video, 4K 120fps slow motion, and a Multifunctional Vision Dock.
$299
Launch priceReleased Sep 2025
EOS R8 Mark II is 1 year newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
EOS R8 Mark II
Wins
Osmo Nano
4 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- AEOS R8 Mark II has higher AF points / zones (1053 vs 0)
- BOsmo Nano has lower Weight (124 g vs 499 g)
- AEOS R8 Mark II has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 15 fps)
- BOsmo Nano has higher Resolution (35 MP vs 24.2 MP)
- BOsmo Nano has higher 1080p max frame rate (240 fps vs 180 fps)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
EOS R8 Mark II
131 × 90 × 80 mm
499 g (1.10 lb / 17.60 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
Osmo Nano
59 × 72 × 28 mm
124 g (0.27 lb / 4.37 oz)
EOS R8 Mark II is 72mm wider, 18mm taller, and 52mm thicker than Osmo Nano.
EOS R8 Mark II is 375 g heavier than Osmo Nano.
Depth (front-to-back): 80mm EOS R8 Mark II · 28mm Osmo Nano
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
EOS R8 Mark II
131 × 90 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Osmo Nano
59 × 72 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
EOS R8 Mark II
131 × 80 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Osmo Nano
59 × 28 mm
Sensor size, to scale
EOS R8 Mark II
36 × 24 mm · Full Frame
864 mm² area
Lens ecosystem
Native lens selection
EOS R8 Mark II
✓ more lensesCanon RF
105+
native lenses available
Osmo Nano: mount data unavailable
Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
EOS R8 Mark II
AF points / zones
1053 vs 0 — higher is better
Subject recognition
Adds Human, Animal, Bird…
Codecs
Adds XF-HEVC S
Stabilization modes
Adds IBIS, Coordinated Control IS, Movie Digital IS…
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 131.3, 89.9, 79.8
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
Burst (electronic)
40 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better
AA filter
Only EOS R8 Mark II supports it
Reasons to choose
Osmo Nano
Codecs
Adds HEVC
Stabilization modes
Adds RockSteady 3.0, HorizonBalancing
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 59.1, 71.7, 28
Card types
Adds microSD
Weight
124 g vs 499 g — lower is better
Resolution
35 MP vs 24.2 MP — higher is better
1080p max frame rate
240 fps vs 180 fps — higher is better
4K max frame rate
60 fps vs 59.94 fps — higher is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓ISO max (native) — Both 25,600
- ✓Burst (mechanical) — Both 6 fps
- ✓Pre-Capture / Pre-Release — Both support pre-capture / pre-release
- ✓Weather sealing — Both support weather sealing
- ✓Card slots — Both 1
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
EOS R8 Mark II
Pros
- ✓Lightest EOS full-frame body with IBIS (546g)
- ✓Up to 7.5-stop Coordinated Control IS
- ✓40fps electronic + 20-frame pre-capture
- ✓Uncropped 6K-oversampled 4K 60p / FHD 180p
- ✓Wi-Fi 6, USB 10 Gbps, headphone jack
Cons
- –Same 24.2MP sensor as original R8
- –Single SD UHS-II slot
- –LP-E17 battery (~340 LCD / 220 EVF shots)
- –No mechanical shutter
Osmo Nano
Pros
- ✓52g camera body
- ✓1/1.3-inch sensor
- ✓4K 120fps slow motion
- ✓10m waterproof camera body
Cons
- –Dock is only IPX4
- –Fixed ultra-wide lens
- –Smaller battery in camera body
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the EOS R8 Mark II and Osmo Nano at major authorized retailers.
Canon EOS R8 Mark II
DJI Osmo Nano
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for portraits, EOS R8 Mark II or Osmo Nano?
EOS R8 Mark II scores 7.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for Osmo Nano — 24.2MP — solid resolution.
What's the resolution difference between the EOS R8 Mark II and Osmo Nano?
EOS R8 Mark II is 24.2 MP and Osmo Nano is 35 MP, so the Osmo Nano captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
Do the EOS R8 Mark II and Osmo Nano have in-body image stabilization?
EOS R8 Mark II has 7.5-stop in-body image stabilization, while Osmo Nano uses Electronic image stabilization (electronic).
Which shoots faster bursts — the EOS R8 Mark II or the Osmo Nano?
EOS R8 Mark II reaches 40 fps electronic. Osmo Nano reaches 15 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the EOS R8 Mark II and Osmo Nano?
EOS R8 Mark II weighs 499 g and Osmo Nano weighs 124 g, so the Osmo Nano is 375 g lighter.
Do the EOS R8 Mark II and Osmo Nano record 4K video?
EOS R8 Mark II: 4K up to 59.94p. Osmo Nano: 4K up to 60p.
Are the EOS R8 Mark II and Osmo Nano weather sealed?
EOS R8 Mark II: Yes. Osmo Nano: Yes.
How much does each cost?
EOS R8 Mark II launched at $1,899 and Osmo Nano at $299. The Osmo Nano is $1,600 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way EOS R8 Mark II vs Osmo Nano vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and DJI press materials.