Canon
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
Pocket 1-inch compact with a 24–100mm f/1.8–2.8 zoom, 4K video, Dual Pixel AF, and live streaming — a classic vlog/travel camera.
$749
Launch priceReleased Jul 2019
DJI
Osmo Nano
Ultra-compact modular action camera with 1/1.3-inch sensor, 35MP stills, 4K 60p video, 4K 120fps slow motion, and a Multifunctional Vision Dock.
$299
Launch priceReleased Sep 2025
Osmo Nano is 6.2 years newer.
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Wins
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
Wins
Osmo Nano
3 categories tied
Which would you choose?
TL;DR — Key differences
- BOsmo Nano has higher RAW buffer depth (60 frames vs 0 frames)
- BOsmo Nano has higher IBIS effectiveness (6 stops vs 0 stops)
- BOsmo Nano has higher 1080p max frame rate (240 fps vs 59.94 fps)
- APowerShot G7 X Mark III has higher Burst (mechanical) (20 fps vs 6 fps)
- BOsmo Nano has lower Weight (124 g vs 304 g)
Key specs at a glance
Size and weight, to scale
📸 Snap this size diff to share
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
105 × 61 × 41 mm
304 g (0.67 lb / 10.72 oz)
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
for scale
Osmo Nano
59 × 72 × 28 mm
124 g (0.27 lb / 4.37 oz)
PowerShot G7 X Mark III is 11mm shorter than Osmo Nano but it is also 46mm wider and 13mm thicker.
PowerShot G7 X Mark III is 180 g heavier than Osmo Nano.
Depth (front-to-back): 41mm PowerShot G7 X Mark III · 28mm Osmo Nano
Back view, to scale
Width × Height — same proportions as the front of the body.
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
105 × 61 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Osmo Nano
59 × 72 mm
Top view, to scale
Width × Depth (front-to-back) — see which body is chunkier on the table.
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
105 × 41 mm
Credit card
85.6 × 54 mm
Osmo Nano
59 × 28 mm
Sensor size, to scale
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch
116 mm² area
Use-case scoring
Which one for what?
Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class
Why pick one over the other
Reasons to choose
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
Subject recognition
Adds Human
Codecs
Adds H.264, MP4
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 105, 60.9, 41.4
Card types
Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC
Burst (mechanical)
20 fps vs 6 fps — higher is better
Battery capacity
1250 mAh vs 530 mAh — higher is better
AA filter
Only PowerShot G7 X Mark III supports it
Eye AF
Only PowerShot G7 X Mark III supports it
Reasons to choose
Osmo Nano
RAW buffer depth
60 frames vs 0 frames — higher is better
Codecs
Adds HEVC
IBIS effectiveness
6 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better
Stabilization modes
Adds RockSteady 3.0, HorizonBalancing
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
Adds 59.1, 71.7, 28
Card types
Adds microSD
1080p max frame rate
240 fps vs 59.94 fps — higher is better
Weight
124 g vs 304 g — lower is better
Both cameras share
- ✓ISO min (native) — Both 100
- ✓Card slots — Both 1
- ✓Touchscreen — Both support touchscreen
- ✓Wi-Fi — Both support wi-fi
- ✓Bluetooth — Both support bluetooth
Pros & cons at a glance
Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.
PowerShot G7 X Mark III
Pros
- ✓1-inch stacked 20.1MP sensor
- ✓24–100mm equivalent zoom (4.2×)
- ✓4K 30p and Full HD 120p
- ✓Dual Pixel CMOS AF
- ✓Live streaming support
Cons
- –Tilt-only screen (not fully articulating)
- –4K limited to 30fps
- –AF weaker than Sony ZV-1 for video
- –No built-in ND filter
Osmo Nano
Pros
- ✓52g camera body
- ✓1/1.3-inch sensor
- ✓4K 120fps slow motion
- ✓10m waterproof camera body
Cons
- –Dock is only IPX4
- –Fixed ultra-wide lens
- –Smaller battery in camera body
Decided which one is right for you?
Compare live prices for the PowerShot G7 X Mark III and Osmo Nano at major authorized retailers.
Canon PowerShot G7 X Mark III
DJI Osmo Nano
Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.
Full specifications
✓ = category winner
Frequently asked
Quick answers generated from verified specs.
Which is better for sports, PowerShot G7 X Mark III or Osmo Nano?
Osmo Nano scores 10.0/10 versus 2.5/10 for PowerShot G7 X Mark III — 15fps burst — fast action ready.
What's the resolution difference between the PowerShot G7 X Mark III and Osmo Nano?
PowerShot G7 X Mark III is 20.1 MP and Osmo Nano is 35 MP, so the Osmo Nano captures more detail for cropping and large prints.
How does stabilization compare between the PowerShot G7 X Mark III and Osmo Nano?
PowerShot G7 X Mark III does not have IBIS, while Osmo Nano uses Electronic image stabilization (electronic).
Which shoots faster bursts — the PowerShot G7 X Mark III or the Osmo Nano?
PowerShot G7 X Mark III reaches 20 fps electronic. Osmo Nano reaches 15 fps electronic.
What's the weight difference between the PowerShot G7 X Mark III and Osmo Nano?
PowerShot G7 X Mark III weighs 304 g and Osmo Nano weighs 124 g, so the Osmo Nano is 180 g lighter.
Do the PowerShot G7 X Mark III and Osmo Nano record 4K video?
PowerShot G7 X Mark III: 4K up to 29.97p. Osmo Nano: 4K up to 60p.
Are the PowerShot G7 X Mark III and Osmo Nano weather sealed?
PowerShot G7 X Mark III: No. Osmo Nano: Yes.
How much does each cost?
PowerShot G7 X Mark III launched at $749 and Osmo Nano at $299. The Osmo Nano is $450 less.
Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.
Add any camera to get a three-way PowerShot G7 X Mark III vs Osmo Nano vs X comparison.
Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.
Product images courtesy of Canon and DJI press materials.