Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg
Osmo Pocket 4P

DJI

Osmo Pocket 4P

Dual-lens pocket gimbal camera with 1-inch wide and 1/1.28-inch tele sensors, 37MP stills, 4K/240fps slow motion, 103GB built-in storage, and 210-min battery.

Launch price

Released Jun 2026

vs

Panasonic

Lumix ZS200

Pocket travel zoom with 1-inch sensor and 15x Leica lens for vacations.

$799

Launch price

Released Feb 2018

Osmo Pocket 4P is 8.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

8categories

Osmo Pocket 4P

Sports & Action

Wins

0categories

Lumix ZS200

1 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

Osmo Pocket 4P wins 5 categories·Lumix ZS200 wins 0 categories
  • AOsmo Pocket 4P has higher IBIS effectiveness (8 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AOsmo Pocket 4P has higher 1080p max frame rate (240 fps vs 60 fps)
  • AOsmo Pocket 4P has lower ISO min (native) (50 vs 125)
  • AOsmo Pocket 4P has higher ISO max (native) (25,600 vs 12,800)
  • AOsmo Pocket 4P has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 30 fps)

Key specs at a glance

Osmo Pocket 4PLumix ZS200
Resolution37 MP20.1 MP
Sensor13.2 × 8.8 mm13.2 x 8.8 mm
ISO max25,60012,800
4K60 fps30 fps
IBISNoNo
Weight230 g340 g
Burst30 fps
Battery370 shots

Size and weight, to scale

Osmo Pocket 4P front view

Osmo Pocket 4P

34 × 160 × 63 mm

230 g (0.51 lb / 8.11 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

Lumix ZS200

111 × 66 × 45 mm

340 g (0.75 lb / 11.99 oz)

Osmo Pocket 4P is 78mm narrower than Lumix ZS200 but it is also 93mm taller and 18mm thicker.

Osmo Pocket 4P is 110 g lighter than Lumix ZS200.

Depth (front-to-back): 63mm Osmo Pocket 4P · 45mm Lumix ZS200

Sensor size, to scale

Osmo Pocket 4P

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch

116 mm² area

Lumix ZS200

13.2 × 8.8 mm · 1-inch

116 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseOsmo Pocket 4PLumix ZS200
Portrait
2.5Limited
3.0Limited✓ wins
Sports & Action
6.5Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Video & Hybrid
3.0Limited
3.0Limited
Landscape
3.0Limited✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
4.5Fair
4.5Fair
Wildlife
0.0Limited
4.0Fair✓ wins
Vlogging
4.0Fair✓ wins
3.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

Osmo Pocket 4P

  • Codecs

    Adds HEVC

  • IBIS effectiveness

    8 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 33.5, 159.5, 63.3

  • Card types

    Adds microSD

  • 1080p max frame rate

    240 fps vs 60 fps — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    50 vs 125 — lower is better

  • ISO max (native)

    25,600 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

Lumix ZS200

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human, Face, Eye…

  • Codecs

    Adds H.264, MP4, AVCHD

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 111.2, 66.4, 45.2

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Eye AF

    Only Lumix ZS200 supports it

  • Animal / bird AF

    Only Lumix ZS200 supports it

Both cameras share

  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

Osmo Pocket 4P

Pros

  • Dual 20mm + 60mm equivalent lenses
  • 4K/240fps wide-lens slow motion
  • 37MP stills with 9x photo zoom
  • 103GB built-in storage + 1TB microSD

Cons

  • No weathersealing
  • Fixed dual-lens system
  • Price not yet listed on DJI specs page

Lumix ZS200

Pros

  • True pocket size
  • 1-inch sensor
  • 24–360mm zoom

Cons

  • Small sensor vs FF
  • No viewfinder grip
  • Older model

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the Osmo Pocket 4P and Lumix ZS200 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

Osmo Pocket 4P
Lumix ZS200
Resolution
37 MP+84%
20.1 MP
Sensor type
Dual CMOS: 1-inch wide + 1/1.28-inch tele
1-inch High Sensitivity MOS
Sensor size
13.2 × 8.8 mm
13.2 x 8.8 mm
AA filter
No
No
Osmo Pocket 4P
Lumix ZS200
Aperture
f/2.0 wide; f/1.8 tele
f/3.3-6.4
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
20 mm wide; 60 mm tele
24-360 mm
Osmo Pocket 4P
Lumix ZS200
Processor
Venus Engine
Osmo Pocket 4P
Lumix ZS200
ISO min (native)
50−75 less
125
ISO max (native)
25,600+1 stop
12,800
ISO max (expanded)
51,200
25,600
Osmo Pocket 4P
Lumix ZS200
Shutter type
Electronic shutter
Focal-plane mechanical + electronic shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/2000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for sports, Osmo Pocket 4P or Lumix ZS200?

Osmo Pocket 4P scores 6.5/10 versus 4.5/10 for Lumix ZS200 — 3-axis mechanical gimbal — cinema-smooth footage in motion.

What's the resolution difference between the Osmo Pocket 4P and Lumix ZS200?

Osmo Pocket 4P is 37 MP and Lumix ZS200 is 20.1 MP, so the Osmo Pocket 4P captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

How does stabilization compare between the Osmo Pocket 4P and Lumix ZS200?

Osmo Pocket 4P uses a 3-axis mechanical gimbal, while Lumix ZS200 does not have IBIS.

What's the weight difference between the Osmo Pocket 4P and Lumix ZS200?

Osmo Pocket 4P weighs 230 g and Lumix ZS200 weighs 340 g, so the Osmo Pocket 4P is 110 g lighter.

Do the Osmo Pocket 4P and Lumix ZS200 record 4K video?

Osmo Pocket 4P: 4K up to 60p. Lumix ZS200: 4K up to 30p.

Are the Osmo Pocket 4P and Lumix ZS200 weather sealed?

Osmo Pocket 4P: No. Lumix ZS200: No.

How much does the Lumix ZS200 cost?

Lumix ZS200 launched at $799.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way Osmo Pocket 4P vs Lumix ZS200 vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed June 2026.

Product images courtesy of DJI and Panasonic press materials.