Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg Compare

Fujifilm

X-H2

40MP APS-C hybrid with 8K video and pro stills resolution.

$1,999

Released Sep 2022

vs

Fujifilm

X-T100

Entry SLR-style X-mount body with 24MP APS-C sensor, EVF, and three-way tilting LCD.

$599

Released May 2018

X-H2 is 4.3 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

12categories

X-H2

WildlifeVideo & Hybrid

Wins

1categories

X-T100

Travel

4 categories tied

TL;DR — Key differences

X-H2 wins 5 categories·X-T100 wins 0 categories
  • AX-H2 has higher IBIS effectiveness (7 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AX-H2 has higher RAW buffer depth (202 frames vs 10 frames)
  • AX-H2 has higher Max video bit rate (720 Mbps vs 50 Mbps)
  • AX-H2 has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 15 fps)
  • AX-H2 has higher Burst (electronic) (20 fps vs 6 fps)

Key specs at a glance

X-H2X-T100
Resolution40.2 MP24.2 MP
SensorAPS-CAPS-C
ISO max12,80012,800
Burst20 fps6 fps
4K60 fps15 fps
IBIS7-stopNo
Weight660 g448 g
Battery540 shots430 shots

Size and weight, to scale

X-H2

136 × 93 × 85 mm

660 g (1.46 lb / 23.28 oz)

X-T100

121 × 83 × 47 mm

448 g (0.99 lb / 15.80 oz)

X-H2 is 15mm wider, 10mm taller, and 37mm thicker than X-T100.

X-H2 is 212 g heavier than X-T100.

Depth (front-to-back): 85mm X-H2 · 47mm X-T100

Sensor size, to scale

X-H2

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

X-T100

23.5 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

369 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

X-H2

✓ more lenses

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

X-T100

✓ more lenses

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX-H2X-T100
Portrait
7.5Good✓ wins
5.5Fair
Sports & Action
8.5Excellent✓ wins
2.0Limited
Video & Hybrid
9.0Excellent✓ wins
3.0Limited
Landscape
6.5Good✓ wins
1.5Limited
Travel
6.0Good
6.0Good
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
1.0Limited
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
4.0Fair

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X-H2

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animal, Bird, Automobile…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    7 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.3, 92.9, 84.6

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II, SDXC V90

  • RAW buffer depth

    202 frames vs 10 frames — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    720 Mbps vs 50 Mbps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT…

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 15 fps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

X-T100

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Human

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 121, 83, 47.4

  • Card types

    Adds SD UHS-I

  • Weight

    448 g vs 660 g — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • ISO max (native)Both 12,800
  • AF points / zonesBoth 425
  • AF frame coverageBoth 100 %
  • Eye AFBoth support eye af
  • EVF refresh rateBoth 120 Hz
  • TouchscreenBoth support touchscreen

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X-H2

Pros

  • 40MP APS-C
  • 8K video
  • IBIS

Cons

  • APS-C
  • Large files
  • Complex video modes

X-T100

Pros

  • Built-in EVF
  • 24MP APS-C
  • Great battery life

Cons

  • 4K limited to 15p
  • Entry AF
  • No IBIS

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the X-H2 and X-T100 at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

X-H2
X-T100
Resolution
40.2 MP+66%
24.2 MP
Sensor type
APS-C X-Trans CMOS 5 HR
APS-C Bayer CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 x 15.6 mm
23.5 x 15.7 mm
AA filter
No
No
X-H2
X-T100
AF system
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
Intelligent Hybrid AF (TTL contrast AF / TTL phase detection AF)
AF points / zones
425
425
AF frame coverage
100 %
100 %
AF low-light limit
-7 EV
Eye AF
Yes
Yes
Animal / bird AF
Yes
No
Subject recognition
Animal, Bird, Automobile, Motorcycle/Bike, Airplane, Train
Human
X-H2
X-T100
Burst (mechanical)
15 fps2.5× more
6 fps
Burst (electronic)
20 fps3.3× more
6 fps
Pre-Capture / Pre-Release
Yes
No
RAW buffer depth
202 frames20.2× more
10 frames
X-H2
X-T100
Max resolution
8K
4K
4K max frame rate
60 fps4× more
15 fps
Max video bit rate
720 Mbps14.4× more
50 Mbps
Internal RAW video
Yes
No
Log profile
F-Log / F-Log2
None
Codecs
Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT, H.265, H.264
H.264
X-H2
X-T100
Weight
660 g
448 g−212 g less
Dimensions (W×H×D mm)
136.3 × 92.9 × 84.6 mm
121 × 83 × 47.4 mm
Weather sealing
Yes
No

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, X-H2 or X-T100?

X-H2 scores 10.0/10 versus 1.0/10 for X-T100 — 20fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the X-H2 and X-T100?

X-H2 is 40.2 MP and X-T100 is 24.2 MP, so the X-H2 captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the X-H2 and X-T100 have in-body image stabilization?

X-H2 has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while x-T100 does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the X-H2 or the X-T100?

X-H2 reaches 20 fps electronic. X-T100 reaches 6 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the X-H2 and X-T100?

X-H2 weighs 660 g and X-T100 weighs 448 g, so the X-T100 is 212 g lighter.

Do the X-H2 and X-T100 record 4K video?

X-H2: 8K (max), 4K up to 60p. X-T100: 4K up to 15p.

Are the X-H2 and X-T100 weather sealed?

X-H2: Yes. X-T100: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 540 shots (CIPA) for the X-H2 and 430 shots for the X-T100, giving the X-H2 the edge.

How much does each cost?

X-H2 launched at $1,999 and X-T100 at $599. The X-T100 is $1,400 less.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed May 2026.