Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Fujifilm

X-H2S

Stacked APS-C speed flagship with 40fps and 6.2K video.

$2,499

Launch price

Released May 2022

vs

Ricoh

GR II

Classic APS-C GR with 16.2MP sensor, 28mm equivalent lens, built-in flash, Wi-Fi, and snap-focus street ergonomics.

$799

Launch price

Released Jun 2015

X-H2S is 6.9 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

9categories

X-H2S

WildlifeSports & Action

Wins

3categories

GR II

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

X-H2S wins 5 categories·GR II wins 0 categories
  • AX-H2S has higher IBIS effectiveness (7 stops vs 0 stops)
  • AX-H2S has higher RAW buffer depth (175 frames vs 10 frames)
  • AX-H2S has higher Burst (electronic) (40 fps vs 4 fps)
  • AX-H2S has higher Max video bit rate (720 Mbps vs 150 Mbps)
  • AX-H2S has higher Burst (mechanical) (15 fps vs 4 fps)

Key specs at a glance

X-H2SGR II
Resolution26.16 MP16.2 MP
SensorAPS-CAPS-C
ISO max12,80025,600
Burst40 fps4 fps
4K120 fps60 fps
IBIS7-stopNo
Weight660 g251 g
Battery580 shots320 shots

Size and weight, to scale

X-H2S

136 × 93 × 85 mm

660 g (1.46 lb / 23.28 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

GR II

117 × 63 × 35 mm

251 g (0.55 lb / 8.85 oz)

X-H2S is 19mm wider, 30mm taller, and 50mm thicker than GR II.

X-H2S is 409 g heavier than GR II.

Depth (front-to-back): 85mm X-H2S · 35mm GR II

Sensor size, to scale

X-H2S

23.5 × 15.6 mm · APS-C

367 mm² area

GR II

23.7 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

372 mm² area

Lens ecosystem

Native lens selection

X-H2S

✓ more lenses

Fujifilm X

105+

native lenses available

45 first-party60 third-party

GR II: mount data unavailable

Counts include current first-party and major third-party native autofocus lenses.

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseX-H2SGR II
Portrait
6.5Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Sports & Action
9.5Excellent✓ wins
1.0Limited
Video & Hybrid
6.5Good✓ wins
2.5Limited
Landscape
5.0Fair✓ wins
0.0Limited
Travel
7.0Good✓ wins
4.5Fair
Wildlife
10.0Excellent✓ wins
0.0Limited
Vlogging
5.5Fair✓ wins
3.5Limited

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

X-H2S

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Animal, Bird, Automobile…

  • Codecs

    Adds Apple ProRes 422 HQ, Apple ProRes 422, Apple ProRes 422 LT…

  • IBIS effectiveness

    7 stops vs 0 stops — higher is better

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 136.3, 92.9, 84.6

  • Card types

    Adds CFexpress Type B, SD UHS-II, SDXC V90

  • RAW buffer depth

    175 frames vs 10 frames — higher is better

  • Burst (electronic)

    40 fps vs 4 fps — higher is better

  • Max video bit rate

    720 Mbps vs 150 Mbps — higher is better

Reasons to choose

GR II

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Face

  • Codecs

    Adds MPEG-4 AVC/H.264

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 117, 62.8, 34.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC UHS-I

  • Weight

    251 g vs 660 g — lower is better

  • ISO max (native)

    25,600 vs 12,800 — higher is better

  • ISO min (native)

    100 vs 160 — lower is better

Both cameras share

  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

X-H2S

Pros

  • 40fps burst
  • Stacked APS-C
  • 6.2K video
  • Great AF

Cons

  • APS-C sensor
  • Complex menus
  • Crop for some modes

GR II

Pros

  • APS-C sensor
  • 28mm GR lens
  • Built-in flash
  • Great used value

Cons

  • Older 16MP sensor
  • No IBIS
  • Fixed lens

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the X-H2S and GR II at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

X-H2S
GR II
Resolution
26.16 MP+61%
16.2 MP
Sensor type
APS-C X-Trans CMOS 5 HS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
23.5 x 15.6 mm
23.7 x 15.7 mm
AA filter
No
No
X-H2S
GR II
Aperture
F2.8-F16
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
28 mm
X-H2S
GR II
Processor
X-Processor 5
GR ENGINE V
X-H2S
GR II
ISO min (native)
160
100−60 less
ISO max (native)
12,800
25,600+1 stop
ISO max (expanded)
51,200
25,600
X-H2S
GR II
Shutter type
Focal Plane Shutter
Leaf shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/8000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/32000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for wildlife, X-H2S or GR II?

X-H2S scores 10.0/10 versus 0.0/10 for GR II — 40fps burst captures fleeting moments.

What's the resolution difference between the X-H2S and GR II?

X-H2S is 26.16 MP and GR II is 16.2 MP, so the X-H2S captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the X-H2S and GR II have in-body image stabilization?

X-H2S has 7-stop in-body image stabilization, while GR II does not have IBIS.

Which shoots faster bursts — the X-H2S or the GR II?

X-H2S reaches 40 fps electronic. GR II reaches 4 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the X-H2S and GR II?

X-H2S weighs 660 g and GR II weighs 251 g, so the GR II is 409 g lighter.

Do the X-H2S and GR II record 4K video?

X-H2S: 4K up to 120p. GR II: 4K up to 60p.

Are the X-H2S and GR II weather sealed?

X-H2S: Yes. GR II: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 580 shots (CIPA) for the X-H2S and 320 shots for the GR II, giving the X-H2S the edge.

How much does each cost?

X-H2S launched at $2,499 and GR II at $799. The GR II is $1,700 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way X-H2S vs GR II vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed July 2026.