Cameraegg Compare logoCameraegg

Ricoh

GR II

Classic APS-C GR with 16.2MP sensor, 28mm equivalent lens, built-in flash, Wi-Fi, and snap-focus street ergonomics.

$799

Launch price

Released Jun 2015

vs
GR IVx

Ricoh

GR IVx

40mm-equivalent GR IV sibling with a newly designed 26.1mm f/2.8 lens, 25.74MP APS-C sensor, 5-axis SR, 4K video, 53GB internal storage, and pocket street-camera handling. Winter 2026 planned.

$1,499

Launch price

Released Dec 2026

GR IVx is 11.4 years newer.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Wins

3categories

GR II

Wins

3categories

GR IVx

Portrait

5 categories tied

Which would you choose?

TL;DR — Key differences

GR II wins 2 categories·GR IVx wins 3 categories
  • BGR IVx has higher ISO max (native) (204,800 vs 25,600)
  • AGR II has higher 4K max frame rate (60 fps vs 30 fps)
  • BGR IVx has higher 1080p max frame rate (60 fps vs 30 fps)
  • BGR IVx has higher Resolution (25.74 MP vs 16.2 MP)
  • AGR II has higher Battery life (CIPA) (320 shots vs 250 shots)

Key specs at a glance

GR IIGR IVx
Resolution16.2 MP25.74 MP
SensorAPS-CAPS-C
ISO max25,600204,800
Burst4 fps4 fps
4K60 fps30 fps
IBISNoYes
Weight251 g265 g
Battery320 shots250 shots

Size and weight, to scale

GR II

117 × 63 × 35 mm

251 g (0.55 lb / 8.85 oz)

Credit card shown to scale as a size reference (ISO 7810, 85.6 × 54 mm)

Credit card

85.6 × 54 mm

for scale

GR IVx front view

GR IVx

109 × 61 × 33 mm

265 g (0.58 lb / 9.35 oz)

GR II is 8mm wider, 2mm taller, and 1mm thicker than GR IVx.

GR II is 14 g lighter than GR IVx.

Depth (front-to-back): 35mm GR II · 33mm GR IVx

Sensor size, to scale

GR II

23.7 × 15.7 mm · APS-C

372 mm² area

GR IVx

23.3 × 15.5 mm · APS-C

361 mm² area

Use-case scoring

Which one for what?

Algorithmic scores from verified specs · 10 = best in class

Use caseGR IIGR IVx
Portrait
2.5Limited
6.5Good✓ wins
Sports & Action
1.0Limited
1.0Limited
Video & Hybrid
2.5Limited
4.0Fair✓ wins
Landscape
0.0Limited
2.5Limited✓ wins
Travel
4.5Fair
5.5Fair✓ wins
Wildlife
0.0Limited
1.0Limited✓ wins
Vlogging
3.5Limited
5.5Fair✓ wins

Why pick one over the other

Reasons to choose

GR II

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 117, 62.8, 34.7

  • Card types

    Adds SD, SDHC, SDXC UHS-I

  • 4K max frame rate

    60 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Battery life (CIPA)

    320 shots vs 250 shots — higher is better

  • Weight

    251 g vs 265 g — lower is better

Reasons to choose

GR IVx

  • Dimensions (W×H×D mm)

    Adds 109.4, 61.1, 33.4

  • Card types

    Adds microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC UHS-I

  • ISO max (native)

    204,800 vs 25,600 — higher is better

  • Eye AF

    Only GR IVx supports it

  • Subject recognition

    Adds Eye

  • 1080p max frame rate

    60 fps vs 30 fps — higher is better

  • Codecs

    Adds MOV

  • In-body stabilization (IBIS)

    Only GR IVx supports it

Both cameras share

  • ISO min (native)Both 100
  • Burst (mechanical)Both 4 fps
  • Burst (electronic)Both 4 fps
  • Max video bit rateBoth 150 Mbps
  • Card slotsBoth 1
  • Wi-FiBoth support wi-fi

Pros & cons at a glance

Editorially curated highlights and trade-offs.

GR II

Pros

  • APS-C sensor
  • 28mm GR lens
  • Built-in flash
  • Great used value

Cons

  • Older 16MP sensor
  • No IBIS
  • Fixed lens

GR IVx

Pros

  • New 26.1mm f/2.8 GR lens (40mm equiv.)
  • GR IV 25.74MP APS-C + 5-axis SR
  • 4K 30p/24p and 53GB built-in storage
  • Snap focus, 50/71mm crops, 2-stop ND
  • Pocketable 265g body

Cons

  • Price not yet announced (listed at GR IV $1,499)
  • Winter 2026 or later — still in development as of Aug 2026
  • No built-in EVF
  • Fixed 40mm-equiv. lens

Decided which one is right for you?

Compare live prices for the GR II and GR IVx at major authorized retailers.

Affiliate disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, Cameraegg earns from qualifying purchases. Cameraegg may also earn commission from B&H links, at no extra cost to you.

Full specifications

= category winner

GR II
GR IVx
Resolution
16.2 MP
25.74 MP+59%
Sensor type
APS-C CMOS
APS-C CMOS
Sensor size
23.7 x 15.7 mm
23.3 x 15.5 mm
AA filter
No
No
GR II
GR IVx
Aperture
F2.8-F16
F2.8-F16
Focal length (35mm equiv.)
28 mm
40 mm
GR II
GR IVx
Processor
GR ENGINE V
GR ENGINE 7
GR II
GR IVx
ISO min (native)
100
100
ISO max (native)
25,600
204,800+3 stops
ISO max (expanded)
25,600
204,800
GR II
GR IVx
Shutter type
Leaf shutter
Leaf shutter
Max mechanical speed
1/4000 sec
1/4000 sec
Max electronic speed
1/16000 sec
1/16000 sec

Frequently asked

Quick answers generated from verified specs.

Which is better for portraits, GR II or GR IVx?

GR IVx scores 6.5/10 versus 2.5/10 for GR II — 25.74MP — solid resolution.

What's the resolution difference between the GR II and GR IVx?

GR II is 16.2 MP and GR IVx is 25.74 MP, so the GR IVx captures more detail for cropping and large prints.

Do the GR II and GR IVx have in-body image stabilization?

GR II does not have IBIS, while GR IVx has in-body image stabilization.

Which shoots faster bursts — the GR II or the GR IVx?

GR II reaches 4 fps electronic. GR IVx reaches 4 fps electronic.

What's the weight difference between the GR II and GR IVx?

GR II weighs 251 g and GR IVx weighs 265 g, so the GR II is 14 g lighter.

Do the GR II and GR IVx record 4K video?

GR II: 4K up to 60p. GR IVx: 4K up to 30p.

Are the GR II and GR IVx weather sealed?

GR II: No. GR IVx: No.

Which has better battery life?

Rated battery life is 320 shots (CIPA) for the GR II and 250 shots for the GR IVx, giving the GR II the edge.

How much does each cost?

GR II launched at $799 and GR IVx at $1,499. The GR II is $700 less.

Can't decide between two? Compare a third camera.

Add any camera to get a three-way GR II vs GR IVx vs X comparison.

Specs sourced from manufacturer data. Use-case scores algorithmically derived. Last reviewed September 2026.

Product images courtesy of Ricoh press materials.